Boxer Confirms That Some Bike/Ped Protections Remain in Final Bill


Sen. Barbara Boxer just issued the following statement. It confirms that “half of the funds for bike paths and pedestrian walkways [will be allocated] directly to local entities,” as spelled out in the Cardin-Cochran amendment. It appears that the “opt-out” provision for states only applies to the half that they control, after local governments have their say. That’s still a blow to the Cardin-Cochran amendment, however, which required states to hold a competitive grant process to distribute their half of the funds.

Photo: ## Portland##

As it is, the amount included for bike/ped in “Additional Activities” under the Senate bill was less than has been allotted to Transportation Enhancements, and included eligibility for many more programs, including some road projects.

Without further ado, here’s Boxer’s statement:

I am so glad that House Republicans met Democrats half way, as Senate Republicans did months ago.

The bill is funded at current levels, and it will protect and create three million jobs. This job creation is the critical focus of Democrats, because we know that the unemployment rate in construction is at an unacceptable level.

We speed up project delivery, cut red tape, and do it without jeopardizing environmental laws. For the first time, we send half of the funds for bike paths and pedestrian walkways directly to local entities, and we protect those funds while giving states more flexibility on their share.

Our country needs the kind of economic boost that this bill offers, and I am looking forward to getting it to the President’s desk.

It is ironic that in June 1956 the Senate passed its first highway bill, and thanks to the work of many committees and all parties, we will not allow that great history of our interstate transportation system to disappear.

11 thoughts on Boxer Confirms That Some Bike/Ped Protections Remain in Final Bill

  1. What does “directly to local entities” really mean in terms of allocation? Per capita or some other formula? A national competitive grant program?

  2. Yeah what’s ironic – that 56 years later the bill is being reauthorized in the month of June again? That’s not irony it’s coincidence or perhaps symbolism. Whatever, this is about the best news one could hope for in this political climate

  3. let’s see what’s actually in the bill – Boxer ‘saved’ bike/ped funding last year as well when she let states opt-out of all of it – don’t forget that the Cardin-Cochran language helped fix serious problems in her original bill

  4. It’s starting to seem that throwing so much money at our failed, polluting highway system is looking foolish.  We need to start funding sustainable and appropriate transportation systems, and start collecting toll fees for highway construction and maintenance.

  5. Sen. Boxer indicates that “I am so glad that House Republicans met Democrats half way, as Senate Republicans did months ago.” By my calculation, if she met the Republicans half way twice then she got no more that 25% of what she originally wanted. And it looks like bike/ped programs probably took at least a 75% hit from current law, in terms of both policy and funding. We may take solace in the wisdom of the founders in only creating a bicameral legislative body because if Sen. Boxer were required to meet the Republicans legislative leaders halfway in additional negotiations there would quickly be nothing left.

  6. I guess we’ve averted total Bike/Ped catastrophe, but this “compromise” is pretty lame….not too much funding left out of what was already a piddling sum. However, more and more local entities are realizing that it makes financial sense to spend city and state funds to make roads safe for all users. Between the health benefits accrued by walkers and cyclists, to the reduced wear and tear on roads each time you take a car off the road, bike/ped infrastructure investments are looking better every day.

  7. saimin, “Thank you, Senator Boxer!” for what? Sounds like meager amount of bicycling and walking funding got cut even more. This will make our roads more dangerous and deprive Americans of transportation choices.

    I think we would’ve been better off with another clean extension.

    Once again, it’s up to local advocates to fight to give people more transportation options and for mayors and other local officials to deliver it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


House Attack on Safe Streets Makes Transpo Bill Ever More Elusive

We reported last week that the House had proposed allowing states to “opt out” of funding bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements in its counter-offer to the Senate during transportation bill negotiations. The House GOP essentially wants to reject the Cardin-Cochran amendment, which gave local governments control over half the “Additional Activities” funding set aside for […]

Fate of Bike-Ped Compromise Still Unknown as House Reconvenes

The Senate has left town for their traditional late-May nine-day weekend, while the House has just returned from their own week off. Amid these comings and goings, work continues on the transportation bill, which has been concealed inside the conference committee’s secret underground lair since the beginning of May. Last week, we reported that several […]

Good News: Cardin-Cochran Amendment Incorporated Into Senate Bill

Majority Leader Harry Reid has incorporated much of the Ben Cardin/Thad Cochran amendment into the so-called “manager’s mark” of the Senate transportation bill. The move means that the amendment’s provisions letting local governments directly access funding from popular bicycle and pedestrian programs will be included in the bill without having to come up for a separate […]

Broad Coalition Urges Congress to Support Local Control of Bike-Ped Funds

A coalition of 70 organizations, including the US Conference of Mayors, American Heart Association, and the National PTA, have signed on to a letter from America Bikes urging Congress to preserve the Cardin-Cochran amendment — a provision in the Senate transportation bill that allows local agencies to directly access funds street safety projects. The letter is addressed […]