Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog

Toxic Pre-Recession Bank Deals Haunt Struggling Transit Agencies

Image: ##http://refundtransit.org/## Refund Transit##

In the midst of major funding crises and unprecedented demand, transit agencies across the country are paying hundreds of millions of dollars to big banks because of bad deals made in the pre-recession, pre-bailout days. That's according to a new report from Refund Transit, a coalition of transit unions and community organizations calling for banks to voluntarily renegotiate these deals.

The financial products that got transit agencies in trouble are called interest rate swaps -- deals that were supposed to protect transit agencies against increases in borrowing costs. Instead, after the economy fell off a cliff in 2008, interest rates are now at historic lows, and transit agencies are stuck paying many times the current competitive rates.

Refund Transit's survey of 12 major transit providers found that public transportation agencies were overpaying by $529 million thanks to these deals, which were sold as a way to minimize risk and save money. Los Angeles's transit system is losing $19.6 million annually compared to the interest rates they would otherwise be paying. Detroit -- where low-income workers face up to three-hour transit waits and are occasionally stranded -- loses $54 million annually. The state of New Jersey's transit system loses $83 million, according to the report.

The Refund Transit coalition includes the Amalgamated Transit Union, the Transportation Equity Network, and a handful of grassroots community groups, and they are calling on banks to renegotiate.

"Banks sold these deals as insurance policies that would let taxpayers lock in lower interest rates without having to worry about rates shooting up in the future," the organization says in the report. "However, these deals were actually more of a gamble than an insurance policy."

Larry Hanley, president of the Amalgamated Transit Union, said banks should not be profiting from conditions they helped to create, especially since banks themselves were insulated from the economic crash by taxpayer funds.

"We got them out of their mess," he said. "Today we are lending the banks money at 0.5 percent a year – the taxpayer is lending them the money – but then in turn, they are gouging the taxpayer through these agencies and through the city governments."

Meanwhile, earlier this week, the city of Baltimore and the Tennessee Department of Transportation, acting as part of a class action lawsuit, settled a lawsuit against JP Morgan that charged the lender colluded with other major banks to manipulate interest rates downward -- exacerbating losses for public entities who purchased this type of financial product.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Climate Change Is Making Waiting For Transit Worse — And It’s Hurting Ridership

Transit isn't only a key solution to confronting climate change; it's also one of its victims.

March 12, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines Are About Elon-ed Out

While President Trump tries to pump up Tesla stock prices, Elon Musk wants to privatize Amtrak.

March 12, 2025

How Highways Rend Our Social Fabric — and the Challenge of Mending It

Roads are supposed to connect us. So why do so many highways tear our social networks apart?

March 11, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Walk the Line

Pedestrian deaths were trending slightly downward at the midway point of last year, but the trend over the past decade is still terrifying.

March 11, 2025

Massachusetts Lawmakers Are Still Spending Millions to Subsidize Elon Musk’s Car Company

In the three months between Election Day and February 5th (the last date for which data is currently available), Massachusetts taxpayers have sent $8.6 million in direct payments to buyers at Tesla dealerships.

March 10, 2025
See all posts