The Amazing Disappearing State Gas Tax
The Missouri Department of Transportation wants to widen I-70 between St. Louis and Kansas City. But as we've been reporting, many state DOTs just don't have the money for major highway expansions anymore -- and Missouri is no exception.
So to pay for this project, which is projected to cost anywhere from $1.5 billion to $4 billion, MoDOT has been exploring the idea of doubling the state gas tax over ten years. Raising the gas tax is something more states should consider, but for Missouri, it's not going to make expensive highway boondoggles suddenly become affordable, explains Network blog Gateway Streets:
Missouri's state gas tax currently stands at 17¢ a gallon and has not changed since 1996. Let's assume that the proposed gas tax increase first takes effect in 2013. Over the next 9 years, the state gas tax will almost double to 32¢. Assuming the status quo for other states, the new rate would place Missouri 16th, between Oregon and West Virginia.
However, as shown [right], the picture looks much different when adjusting the value of the gas tax for inflation. In 1996, the state gas tax was worth 40% more than what its worth today. And despite MoDOT's proposal to nearly double the gas tax, the 10 year timeframe means that inflation will keep the gas tax from ever reaching the value it had in 1996.
Inflation, however, is but one of the major value depressors of the state gas tax. The other major depressor is the looming increase in CAFE standards. Per legislation signed by President Obama last July, the average fuel economy for cars and light-duty trucks is set to double from 27.5 mpg in 2008 to 54.5 mpg in 2025.
Consequently, a 15¢ gas tax by itself is only just enough to fund MoDOT's dream of I-70 truck only lanes from Kansas City to St. Louis. But, without additional sources of funding such as tolling revenue (or another major gas tax increase), MoDOT will be unable to invest in any other major projects for a long time to come.
We just can't afford to keep building highways where motorists drive for free. Maybe the right move for Missouri is to raise the gas tax and forget about this project.
Elsewhere on the Network today: NRDC Switchboard explains what's so great about the federal TIGER program. Brown Girl in the Lane explains why she thinks vehicular cycling is dangerous and its proponents deluded. And Riding in Riverside says that California's planning and environmental review processes have become too lengthy and too vulnerable to interference by special interest groups.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Thursday’s Headlines Are Down on Highways
Two outlets recently featured articles on the harmful effects of ongoing freeway projects.
Talking Headways Podcast: Details of Development Reform in Minnesota, Part I
Jim Kumon of Electric Housing discusses his work as a developer and urban policy educator in the Twin Cities.
Thursday’s Headlines Don’t Like Riding on the Passenger Side
Can you take me to the store, and then the bank? I've got five dollars you can put in the tank.
Study: When Speed Limits Rise on Interstates, So Do Crash Hot Spots on Nearby Roads
Rising interstate speeds don't just make roads deadlier for people who drive on them — and local decision makers need to be prepared.
Calif. Bill to Require Speed Control in Vehicles Goes Limp
Also passed yesterday were S.B 961, the Complete Streets bill, a bill on Bay Area transit funding, and a prohibition on state funding for Class III bikeways.
