Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

The Missouri Department of Transportation wants to widen I-70 between St. Louis and Kansas City. But as we've been reporting, many state DOTs just don't have the money for major highway expansions anymore -- and Missouri is no exception.

false

So to pay for this project, which is projected to cost anywhere from $1.5 billion to $4 billion, MoDOT has been exploring the idea of doubling the state gas tax over ten years. Raising the gas tax is something more states should consider, but for Missouri, it's not going to make expensive highway boondoggles suddenly become affordable, explains Network blog Gateway Streets:

Missouri's state gas tax currently stands at 17¢ a gallon and has not changed since 1996. Let's assume that the proposed gas tax increase first takes effect in 2013. Over the next 9 years, the state gas tax will almost double to 32¢. Assuming the status quo for other states, the new rate would place Missouri 16th, between Oregon and West Virginia.

However, as shown [right], the picture looks much different when adjusting the value of the gas tax for inflation. In 1996, the state gas tax was worth 40% more than what its worth today. And despite MoDOT's proposal to nearly double the gas tax, the 10 year timeframe means that inflation will keep the gas tax from ever reaching the value it had in 1996.

Inflation, however, is but one of the major value depressors of the state gas tax. The other major depressor is the looming increase in CAFE standards. Per legislation signed by President Obama last July, the average fuel economy for cars and light-duty trucks is set to double from 27.5 mpg in 2008 to 54.5 mpg in 2025.

Consequently, a 15¢ gas tax by itself is only just enough to fund MoDOT's dream of I-70 truck only lanes from Kansas City to St. Louis. But, without additional sources of funding such as tolling revenue (or another major gas tax increase), MoDOT will be unable to invest in any other major projects for a long time to come.

We just can't afford to keep building highways where motorists drive for free. Maybe the right move for Missouri is to raise the gas tax and forget about this project.

Elsewhere on the Network today: NRDC Switchboard explains what's so great about the federal TIGER program. Brown Girl in the Lane explains why she thinks vehicular cycling is dangerous and its proponents deluded. And Riding in Riverside says that California's planning and environmental review processes have become too lengthy and too vulnerable to interference by special interest groups.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Monday’s Headlines Are Dragging Their Feet

The Trump administration claims the Biden administration left them with a backlog — but they've actually been far slower at getting transportation money to states than their predecessors, a new analysis finds.

July 14, 2025

These U.S. Communities’ So-Called ‘Complete Streets’ Policies Don’t Even Deserve the Name

Any city can call itself a "Complete Streets" champion. But not all of them are walking the walk — and if they don't, a top organization says they'll no longer give them a platform on its esteemed "best of" ranking.

July 14, 2025

Communities Rally To Reclaim Streets From ICE Terror

"This is an attack on Los Angeles. This is an attack on California. On all of us."

July 11, 2025

Friday Video: The London Neighborhood Where Bikes Outnumber Cars

...and how they got to that impressive milestone.

July 11, 2025

Friday’s Headlines Battle Galactus

Like the Marvel supervillain, U.S. interstate highway system seems to eat up everything in his path. A new book explores how to stop it.

July 11, 2025

New Report Shows Pedestrian Fatalities Drop — But Experts Say Not Enough

The Governors Highway Safety Association report showed a 4 percent drop in the number of pedestrian deaths last year, putting a slow on a dangerous trend — but advocates say the drop isn't nearly big enough.

July 11, 2025
See all posts