Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Barack Obama

In Push For Jobs Bill, Obama Picks the Wrong Bridge to Highlight

President Obama stands in enemy territory to push for his jobs bill. Photo: ##http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/09/obama-channels-reagan-rebuild-this-bridge/1?csp=34news##Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP##

President Obama chose the home turf of two of his principal political opponents to highlight the need for more infrastructure investment in the U.S. Standing beneath the Brent Spence Bridge, which connects Cincinnati (the home city of House Speaker John Boehner) with Kentucky (the home state of Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell), Obama made his demand of Congress: "Rebuild this bridge!"

The president was making a push for his $447 billion jobs bill, which could create an estimated 1.9 million jobs.

The Brent Spence Bridge is considered "functionally obsolete." "It's safe to drive on, but it was not designed to accommodate today's traffic, which can stretch for a mile," Obama said.

Many transportation reformers would rather see transportation agencies attend to "structurally deficient" infrastructure -- which is not safe to drive on, despite the fact that thousands of people do it every day -- instead of widening safe, existing roads. This particular bridge project, which local smart growth advocates have been warning about for years, would add more lanes and induce sprawl.

In a post earlier this summer, Jake Mecklenbourg of UrbanCincy criticized the bridge widening project and refuted the claim that the project is of national importance because it lies on a primary trucking route. "The Brent Spence Bridge, like most urban interstate bridges, primarily serves local commuters and delivery trucks," he wrote. "For fifteen years after its construction it was the region’s only interstate highway crossing. But between 1977 and 1979, three other interstate highway bridges opened nearby, providing numerous alternative routes through the Cincinnati area for long-distance travelers."

Transportation reform groups have long opposed a bias toward lane widening, as opposed to repairing structurally deficient bridges. "While the road builders have long reaped higher profits by lobbying for new roads and more lanes, we cannot afford to waste scarce taxpayer dollars on new capacity before we fix what we already have," said U.S. PIRG Tax and Budget Associate Dan Smith.

U.S. PIRG supports the infrastructure proposal contained in the president’s jobs bill. Regardless of the particular bridge Obama chose as the setting for his speech, Smith said the president was on the right track by pushing for repairs and maintenance of existing infrastructure -- especially if the goal is job creation. "Road and bridge repair projects have been shown to create 16 percent more jobs than building new roads, and there are over a million construction workers looking for a job," Smith said. "We should put them to work making our roads safer."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Analysis: What It Would Take To Put America First in Transit Again

No, it won't be easy. Yes, it can be done.

January 14, 2026

Opinion: Transportation Researchers Still Care About Equity. This Week They’re Proving It

This Thursday, progressives in transportation will fight back against the Trump administration.

January 14, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines Still Value Life

The EPA is backtracking on stronger ozone and fine particulate regulations, which could kill thousands of people.

January 14, 2026

Why Other States Should Imitate Illinois’ Groundbreaking Transportation Reform Law

One Illinois law saved the state's transit networks from a fiscal cliff — and created a model that other communities should follow, this group argues.

January 13, 2026

In NYC, Unlicensed Drivers Comprise One-Quarter Of Street Fatalities: Data

Unlicensed drivers are linked to fatal crashes much more often now than pre-pandemic

January 13, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines Need Exercise

Every hour in a car increases the risk of obesity by 6 percent, while walking a kilometer lowers it 5 percent.

January 13, 2026
See all posts