Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
APTA

Communities Urge Congress: “Don’t X Out Transit”

Yesterday, transit advocates in more than two dozen cities around the country held rallies to urge Congress to maintain funding for public transportation. The “Don’t X Out Transit” events brought attention to the massive cuts in service and fare hikes that have besieged U.S. transit agencies, and made it clear that the 30 percent funding cut in the House transportation bill would be a death blow to many systems.

Yesterday's "Don't X Out Transit" rally in Los Angeles. Photo: Crystal McMillan / Bus Riders Union

The American Public Transportation Association collected testimonials from a variety of transit organizations nationwide, explaining what such a deep cut would mean to their service:

A 30 percent cut would probably eliminate our service. Under the present political environment a 30 percent loss in federal support is just another nail in the coffin.

- Northwest Indiana Regional Bus Authority, Hammond, IN

If our 5307 funding were cut by 30 percent, it would amount to a loss of about $360,000. About the only way this can be made up without additional revenues is to eliminate all holiday service and Saturday service (we have never operated on Sundays). Our paratransit service would also no longer operate on holidays and Saturdays… Of course, with these cuts we would also have to lay off operators and other staff.

- City of Las Cruces RoadRUNNER Transit, Las Cruces, NM

A 30 percent cut in federal funding would mean that we would have to cut up to five of our 17 community routes. Our funding situation is already so precarious that our "neighborhood" routes only run four or five trips a day, Monday through Friday, so any further cutbacks would mean elimination of all service on these routes.

- Centre Area Transportation Authority, State College, PA

We have been able to… boost the frequency of service to no more than 15 minutes between buses from 6am to 9pm Monday thru Friday on our most popular routes resulting in the first 4 months a 15 percent increase in ridership and similar results beginning to occur on the routes feeding those two. Cut funding and we will become a system of hour headways.

- Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY

This proposed 30 percent cut in funding would cause an approximate $7 million reduction in service, which equals almost 1 million revenue miles annually, affecting 3 million passengers. This would cause a loss of approximately 50 jobs within our agency.

- San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, San Diego, CA

Overall, “20,000 fewer buses and trains and paratransit vehicles will be purchased, causing breakdowns and overcrowding,” APTA President Bill Millar said on a telephone call with reporters yesterday. “These proposed cuts would impact a total of 46 major expansion projects in 18 states."

Already, many transit systems have been cut to the bone. Amalgamated Transit Union President Larry Hanley told reporters about the elimination of entire transit systems in Clayton County, Georgia and painful cuts in Albany, New York and Lorain, Ohio, where “buses have been laid up in lots because transit systems don’t have the money to operate them.”

“We’re already in a crisis throughout the United States in transit,” Hanley said, “and Congress’s suggestion that we can take a 30 percent cut in the existing program is preposterous.”

Pat Scully of Daimler Buses testified from the point of view of the leading manufacturer of city transit buses in North America. “We’re manufacturing less and less as each day goes by,” he said.

Scully said the six-year proposal by the House would cost jobs but also said that the constant extensions have hit the industry hard.

“These temporary extensions, and the one-third cut that is proposed in investment spending, do nothing but add indecision and uncertainty for our customers and our markets,” Scully went on. “Indecision and uncertainty have led to reduced order intake for the manufacturing base over the past two years. We are all operating at lower production output and employing fewer people now -- without the one-third cut proposed.”

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Trump’s Transportation ‘Funding Freeze’ Was Just the Tip of the Iceberg, GAO Says

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was slow to get money out the door even before the current president threw the process into chaos. This must change.

August 4, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Hit the Beach

North America needs more coastal bikeways like those in European beach towns, David Zipper writes in CityLab.

August 4, 2025

Bus Rapid Transit Can Work … If Cities Follow the Formula

It sure beats the current method of guessing or simply basing the route on how strongly a given neighborhood opposes or supports it.

August 1, 2025

Friday Video: We’re All Paying For ‘Free’ Parking, Whether Or Not We Drive

Parking mandates aren't the only reason why your city has so much asphalt. Check out the hidden reason why so many businesses build way more parking than they need.

August 1, 2025

Friday’s Headlines Take It Back

Apparently transportation can be too "woke." Plus, only cities can save us from climate change now, and more headlines.

August 1, 2025

Opinion: Ohio is the Poster Child for Why We Need a Stronger Federal Approach to Passenger Rail

Ohio's reluctance to build new passenger rail has made them a bottleneck in the national network, and an emblem of bigger national problem.

August 1, 2025
See all posts