Raquel Nelson Likely to Opt For a New Trial, Her Lawyer Says

UPDATE 7/27: Raquel Nelson has, in fact, chosen the option of a new trial.

The last thing the jury heard from Raquel Nelson’s defense lawyer, before they convicted her, was the tape of her frantic 911 call after her son, A.J., was hit by a car. “1-2-3-4-5-6, doing chest compressions on her son, screaming,” recalls attorney David Savoy. “There was not a dry eye in that court room.”

The jury then decided to convict her of vehicular homicide, jaywalking, and reckless conduct.

A.J. Nelson, age 4, was killed while crossing the street between a bus stop and his home with his mother and two sisters.

The jury, as has often been noted, was all white and not transit-dependent. Indeed, Savoy said, the entire pool of 15 jurors they had to choose from was white. And Cobb County jurors are selected for service based on drivers license information.

While certainly many car-free people have drivers licenses – Raquel Nelson included – it’s a symbol, at least, of the auto-centrism of the entire process that convicted Ms. Nelson.

At sentencing, Judge Kathryn Tanksley handed down a relatively light sentence – involving no jail time, at least – but also granted a motion for a new trial before the defense even made a motion asking for a new trial. “We had motion for a new trial ready to file,” Savoy said. “I didn’t even need to pull it out of my briefcase.”

“It’s one of the most shocking things I’ve ever been involved with,” Savoy said. “A judge, on her own motion, granting a new trial.”

He wouldn’t speculate as to why the judge was moved to do so. But he did mention that the jury had made its decision based on the evidence that the judge allowed, indicating that there was other defense evidence that the judge did not allow. Perhaps she regretted that decision, disagreed with the jury’s harsh verdict, and thought a new trial would wipe the slate clean.

Despite the trauma that the case has caused Nelson and her family, Savoy is “pretty certain” she’ll take the option of a new trial. “Three misdemeanors, for crossing the street,” Savoy said. “That doesn’t sit right with her, or with me.”

Given the avalanche of negative attention the case has brought upon the Cobb County court system, the county may decide not to re-try the case at all. Indeed, although judges are supposed to be immune to public opinion, Judge Tanksley must have been aware of the packed courtroom, full of reporters, that greeted her on the day of sentencing. Even if she hadn’t watched the broadcast coverage, seen the petitions, or read the blogs about the case, she must have known the case was attracting major national attention.

“I’ve never understood the power of the blogosphere,” Savoy told me, “and now, I’m humbled.”

6 thoughts on Raquel Nelson Likely to Opt For a New Trial, Her Lawyer Says

  1. This is an absurd conviction. Someone needs to sue Cobb County on Nelson’s behalf for neglecting to provide safe routes for pedestrians along the many highways they call streets. As an emigrant of Cobb County, I can confirm that the county has been negligent in painting crosswalks, putting up pedestrian signage, and in providing sidewalks. Cobb County Transit should have a policy of only installing bus stops where there are crosswalks and safe and accessible pedestrian infrastructure – and if they weren’t already in danger of going bankrupt, I would say they should be sued, too. Car-dominated Cobb County needs complete streets.

  2. I have an 18-year-old nephew who grew up entirely in the western Atlanta/Fulton County urb/suburbs who yesterday went on his first ever bus and train ride (in SF).

  3. smart move, she is guilty and stop comparing Raquel to a mentally ill mother.  Raquel knew what she was doing was WRONG.

  4. Not to belabor the point, but at Austell Road and Cunningham Road (the nearest crosswalk to the south of the collision), there was a bus stop. She wouldn’t have had to walk a third of a mile both ways. The likely impact of this decision is that the offending stop just gets removed, forcing everyone not to jaywalk and increasing travel time for those who ride transit. This is what happened in California when the State Supreme Court decided that transit agencies are liable for dangerous conditions found when riders access bus stops. Rather than adding more protection to crosswalks (the incident in CA happened at a marked but unsignalized crosswalk), transit agencies just remove bus stops when they hear of collisions, or just systematically when they review routes. Thus, in suburban areas, there are half mile to one mile gaps between stops on many routes, as agencies only put bus stops where there is a signalized intersection nearby.

  5. What Jerry Guy did was WRONG – drinking, driving and killing. His 2 prior hit-and-run convictions obviously didn’t stop him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


For Raquel Nelson, Justice Still Elusive

Everyone was relieved to hear earlier this week that Raquel Nelson was spared jail time in the trial that sparked national outrage. But that doesn’t mean justice has been done for the mother who was convicted of vehicular homicide after a hit-and-run driver killed her 4-year-old son. All for simply attempting to navigate a busy, […]

Georgia Prosecutor Continues Case Against Raquel Nelson

The impaired hit-and-run driver who struck and killed her son on a metro Atlanta road in 2010 has been released from prison by now, but Raquel Nelson is still being prosecuted for her purported role in the tragedy. The single mother of three was injured trying to prevent the collision that killed four-year-old A.J. Newman. […]