How Hard Will the Senate Fight Back Against House Spending Cuts?

Members of Congress worked all day Friday, until 4:42 Saturday morning, to finish voting on hundreds of amendments and, finally, the final HR 1 bill to set spending levels for the rest of 2011.

John Boehner and House Republicans voted to strip funding from several programs, including critical sources of financial support for transit.

In the end, the budget bill they passed included 400 amendments and cuts $61 billion out of everything from Planned Parenthood to border security, public radio to foreign aid. And yes – transportation. The House cut funding from Amtrak, TIGER, the DC metro system, high-speed rail, rail safety programs, and the New Starts program for transit expansion.

Colin Peppard at NRDC took a look at how the loss of New Starts would affect transit, using the Bay Area as an example. Despite a half-cent tax hike Santa Clara residents voted for in 2000 to pay for transit expansions, Peppard said, federal assistance is almost always required to help with the big upfront costs. Transit doesn’t get nearly as much federal help as highways, which often have 80 percent of their costs paid for by the feds. The federal match for transit is as little as 50 percent.

Still, that match is essential for many transit expansions to proceed, and Peppard notes that “we won’t see many new transit projects in America if the House Republicans get their way.”

But will Senate Democrats and the president allow them to get their way? Once both chambers come back from their President’s Day recess, they’ve got one week to see eye to eye on spending and get the president to sign off on the budget. Otherwise, they can either pass another “clean” extension of current spending levels – which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says is necessary, but which House Speaker John Boehner has refused to do – or the government will shut down.

The possibility of a shut down seems increasingly likely. “It’s looking like we’re heading in that direction,” said David Goldberg of Transportation for America, “and everybody is more focused on figuring out who gets the blame than on really averting a shutdown.”

The Republicans sure aren’t backing down, says Goldberg, but he doesn’t think the Senate will either. “The truth of the matter is that hacking discretionary spending is going to do beans for the long-term deficit, but it has the potential to stall an economic recovery,” he said.

He also thinks the deep cuts are going to have serious blowback for a lot of members of Congress. “A lot of what got targeted for the cuts were things that conservative supporters have long opposed,” he said, “but in the case of transit investments, it’s not that cut and dried. There are plenty of business and conservative constituents that care about these investments.”

4 thoughts on How Hard Will the Senate Fight Back Against House Spending Cuts?

  1. This is just what the republicans have always done since the 80s. They have the moral majority agenda and want to live in the country they always wanted to live in, one without that pesky first amendment or fair and equitable treatment of its citizens. Whenever the opportunity comes up to proselytize for Jesus and cut things that are opposed to the fundamentalists’ life missions, they embrace it. Blaming these tiny less than 0.01% things for the budget deficit is just their latest strategy. We need TR back, that was one of the last times being a republican meant something.

  2. “But will Senate Democrats and the president allow them to get their way?”

    They would have to grow a spine first … any actual backbone sightings lately?

  3. The federal match for transit is actually a max of 50 percent, and is as little as 20% in New York.

  4. The federal match for transit isn’t “as little as 50 percent.” That is about the maximum you will ever get. Although formally it is possible to request 80%, I don’t believe the FTA has given that much to a transit project in decades.

    Currently budget is so strained that some areas are starting to get less than the standard 50%.

    For instance, LA is only asking for New Starts to cover 38% of the costs of the Westside subway.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


House Transpo Bill Spells Trouble for Transit Projects Across America

A provision in the House GOP’s new transportation bill threatens to upend how transit agencies fund major capital projects, delaying or killing efforts to expand and maintain rail and bus networks. The Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act (STRR), released Tuesday and marked up in committee yesterday, would change funding rules for the three federal programs […]

Just How Bad Is the Final House Transportation Bill?

Nobody was expecting the GOP-controlled House of Representatives to put together a transportation bill that did much for streets and transit in American cities. And they were right — there’s nothing to get excited about in the bill. But neither is it the total disaster for walking, biking, and transit it could have been. So how does the House bill […]