The U.S. Transportation Financing Crisis: A Snapshot From the States
Washington transportation policymaking can often resemble an unwieldy soup of anywhere between 50 and 535 local perspectives, as lawmakers from different states and districts vie for a fixed (or even shrinking) amount of federal funding.
Congress isn’t eager to raise fuel taxes to pay for transportation — but what about the states? (Photo: Pop and Politics)The needs of northeastern states can bear little resemblance to those of their southern or midwestern counterparts, and the mandate for localities to “match” federal transportation funds at an 80-20 ratio (or 50-50, for some transit programs) can prove daunting for cash-strapped areas — particularly as the dwindling value of the gas tax saps transportation budgets.
So as Congress and the Obama administration declining to debate a gas tax increase to pay for the next federal transport bill, how are the states coping?
Some are taking the plunge that Washington won’t, debating new user fees on fuel and driving. Others are simply spending less on maintaining existing infrastructure that is bordering on disrepair. To get a taste of the local developments, let’s take a quick tour of the transportation-financing crisis as it’s unfolding outside of D.C.:
In Kansas, state lawmakers are debating alternative proposals to raise gas taxes and car registration fees to help close a transportation budget that has seen [PDF] $229 million in funding cuts over the past year.
In Virginia, planned transportation cuts over the next six years total $4.6 billion. The planned extension of Washington D.C.’s Metro to Dulles airport will push local tolls 25 cents higher this week, with a planned doubling by 2012. The state gas tax: 40th-highest in the nation, according to the Tax Foundation.
In Georgia, a new report from the state transportation director endorses new revenue-raising methods equivalent to a 1 percent sales tax and warns that the current gas tax — which only meets half of existing infrastructure maintenance needs — may fall short of federal matching requirements as soon as 2012.
In Michigan, an $84 million transportation budget gap for the current fiscal year is expected to cause the loss of $475 million in federal funding. Looking only at maintenance needs, the state fears the share of roads in good repair to fall from 92 percent to 66 percent over the next four years.
In New Jersey, debt service and interest payments on nearly $11 billion in bonding is set to swallow the state’s entire transportation trust fund for 2011, prompting much hand-wringing as new Gov. Chris Christie (R) prepares to take office. Christie campaigned on a promise not to raise the state’s gas tax, which ranks as the nation’s 47th-highest.
In South Dakota, a bipartisan panel of legislators is moving forward with a proposed 10-cent increase in the state gas tax, imposed in two phases, to help raise $240 million for transportation. Other revenue-raising tactics on the table include higher vehicle license fees and new-car excise taxes. The measure could face an uphill battle, however, with a two-thirds majority needed for passage.
In Iowa, a state budget gap estimated at $500 million or more has persuaded Gov. Chet Culver (D) to propose that state troopers be financed by the transportation trust fund — which would leave less money for maintenance of roads and bridges. Bipartisan support for a gas tax increase that materialized last year reportedly has evaporated in the face of a Culver veto threat.
Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.
