Transit Creates As Many Jobs As Roads — But it Could Do Even Better

Members of Congress remain intensely focused on health care this fall, but as the unemployment rate hits double digits in more states, their No. 2 priority is best summed up in three words: Jobs, jobs, jobs.

House Democrats held a job-creation powwow yesterday that gave transportation committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) an opening to press yet again for speedy enactment of his long-term infrastructure bill as a means to boost hiring. And transit advocates lent their voice to that call today, releasing a report [PDF] on the green jobs generated by investment in rail and buses.

Today’s report, released by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) offers a definitive completion of the Washington idiom that estimates how many jobs would be created by $1 billion of federal spending. Lawmakers in both parties have used several different versions of that idiom for highway spending — "$1 billion for roads would create ____ jobs" — but the Federal Highway Administration’s official number was 30,000 in 2007 dollars.

The current mixture of federal aid to transit also generates 30,000 jobs per $1 billion spent, according to APTA’s report, produced by Cambridge Systematics and the Economic Development Research Group. But that total results from the 69-31 federal split between transit capital expenses (i.e. new equipment and tracks) and transit operating expenses (i.e. hiring folks to run the networks).

Washington is currently barred from helping with operating costs for transit agencies in areas where the population exceeds 200,000, a rule that some in Congress are hoping to overturn.

What would the job-creation mix look like if the federal government gave extra aid to transit operating? Check out the chart below:

transit_chart.png(Chart: APTA)


In other words, the more federal aid freed up for transit operating costs, the stronger the job-creation potential. And that’s just one of the economic upsides magnified by a greater emphasis on operating aid; APTA’s report found that $1 billion for transit operating generates $1.8 billion in take-home employee income, which in turn produces more tax revenue for the government.

The Highway Administration, by contrast, found that $1 billion in road spending generated employee income that ranged from $1.06 billion to $1.15 billion.

Given those numbers, one might think Congress would relax its restrictions on transit operating aid. And lawmakers have done something — but it’s limited to 10 percent of money distributed by the stimulus law.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Drivers Cover Just 51 Percent of U.S. Road Spending

|
There’s a persistent misconception in American culture that transit is a big drain on public coffers while roads conveniently and totally pay for themselves through the magic of gas taxes. And that used to be true — at least for interstate highways, a fraction of the total road network. But that was many, many failed […]

It’s Time to Stop Pretending That Roads Pay for Themselves

|
If nothing else, the current round of federal transportation legislating should end the myth that highways are a uniquely self-sufficient form of infrastructure paid for by “user fees,” a.k.a. gas taxes and tolls. With all the general tax revenue that goes toward roads in America, car infrastructure has benefited from hefty subsidies for many years. […]