Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

The Daily News reports that Mayor Bloomberg made his first public statements about U.S. oil dependency on his radio show last week:

This constant dependence on oil is something that leaves this country vulnerable every day. Two reasons. One, what happens if it gets cut off overseas? We're never going to have enough capacity domestically. And, two, where are these petro dollars going? They are going to buy arms for terrorists who are going to attack freedom around the world and, as 9/11 showed, they can attack here as well.

While Streetsblog leans towards global climate change and local quality of life as the more compelling reasons for New York City to care about reducing petroleum consumption, it's great to hear Bloomberg talking about the oil dependence issue.

Still, you've got to wonder how the Mayor connects his personal views to his day job. Bloomberg isn't a radio host, blogger or pundit. He doesn't have to sit behind a microphone or computer monitor and kvetch. He is the Mayor of New York City. He can do something about this problem.

With the stroke of a pen, the Mayor could put in place a number transportation and land use policies that would significantly reduce New York City's automobile dependence and petroleum consumption. And with some more serious political arm-twisting, Bloomberg could probably implement far-reaching traffic-reduction measures similar to what is being tried in London and Paris. Yet, New York City has no long-term transportation vision or stategy. Aside from highly localized projects in places like Staten Island and Downtown Brooklyn, Mayor Bloomberg's Department of Transportation is doing little to address the city's growing traffic congestion problem.

Streetsblog is hoping that this is all part of Bloomberg's Autumn 2006 strategy. He is talking about the petroleum-terrorism connection to help prepare car-dependent Outer Borough New Yorkers for a far-reaching transportation strategy that will, in part, make it less convenient to drive into the city. They'll be more willing to take the hit because they will be made to feel like they aiding America's national security.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Why Transit Advocates Aren’t 100% Behind This Senator’s Bold Bill To Slash Highway Funding

A new Republican bill could bring rampant highway overspending to a halt and slash emissions by one-fifth. But don't get too excited because it would hurt transit, too.

March 17, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines Are Underwater

More and more people can't afford their car payments or associated costs — which wouldn't be as big of a problem if they had a choice other than driving.

March 17, 2026

What If The Rising Costs of Car Dependency Were As Visible As Gas Prices?

Gas station billboards remind U.S. residents every day that driving is getting more expensive. What if they told a different message about the high costs of our autocentric transportation system?

March 16, 2026

Hired Actors, Paid Media: Big Tech Has Dumped $8M Into Car Insurance Rate Cut

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's scheme to bring down insurance costs is backed by Uber cash and ads with professional actors.

March 16, 2026

Monday’s Headlines Zero In

Traffic deaths are going down, and they'd decline further if cities stopped letting residents block safety projects.

March 16, 2026

Trump’s Oil Crisis Is Already Costing Massachusetts Drivers Over $2.4 Million A Day In Higher Gas Prices

Massachusetts drivers are now cumulatively spending $20.9 million a day at the pump – more than twice the daily cost of operating the entire MBTA system.

March 13, 2026
See all posts