How Denver Repaired Its Epic Parking Crater

Downtown Denver June 1976. Image: ##http://www.flickr.com/photos/dboo/6928255828/## Nick DeWolf via Flickr##

The above photo is downtown Denver in 1976.

Not pretty is it? But Denver doesn’t look like that anymore. And that’s no accident.

Even though that picture is what inspired Streetsblog’s Parking Madness competition, Denver didn’t even make it past the first round in our hunt for the worst parking crater in an American downtown.

This is what this part of Denver looks like today:

For reference, point A on the map shows the Daniels and Fisher Tower, the tall spire you can see on the edge of the parking expanse in the 1976 photo.

In the 1990s, in response to the creeping cancer of surface parking, the Mile High City took action. The city changed its downtown zoning to eliminate surface parking as a use by right. So if you owned a building, you were welcome to tear it down, but you couldn’t park cars on the lot. All existing parking lots were grandfathered in.

Many of the lots in the 1976 photo were created by urban renewal campaigns in the 1960s and 70s. “The urban renewal authority would just come in and bulldoze dozens of blocks as a slum clearance program,” said Ken Schroeppel, of the blogs Denver Urbanism and Denver Infill.

But there were other forces at work as well. During the 70s and 80s, says Schroeppel, “[Downtown] Denver went through a big development boom.” A lot of office towers were built, but the city code didn’t require attendant parking. “You had this huge influx of downtown workers without the parking to accommodate them.”

Some property owners saw an opportunity and demolished their buildings. On one hand, they were speculating, hoping a cleared site would catch the eye of a skyscraper developer. On the other hand, they could always collect revenue by using the site as surface parking in the interim.

That 1990s zoning change was the only official action Denver took to stop the spread of parking lots. But the city has held firm, keeping the number of surface parking levels at no greater than they were in the 90s. Even where developers were ignorant of the rule change, the city intervened to stop them from building parking lots.

Meanwhile, other city policies helped ensure many of those lots would be filled in by revenue-generating businesses.

For example, Schroeppel says there’s broad agreement in the Denver metro area that all the major regional attractions — stadiums, museums and the like — should be centered downtown. Rather than offering big incentives to developers, Denver leaders believe in simply helping create an attractive environment for investment, with small-scale amenities like transit, historic preservation and streetscape projects.

Little by little, over the last few decades those surface parking lots are being redeveloped. Redevelopment is stronger in some areas than others, Schroeppel says, and there are still a few “concentrations” of parking, but the problem of parking deserts has been reduced dramatically.

That’s good news for Tulsa, which ran away with our “Golden Crater” award for out-of-control downtown surface parking last month. Last week, the Tulsa World reported the city is moving ahead with a surface parking moratorium much like Denver’s. Who knows, 20 years from now we may be holding up an “after” picture to match this current shot of Tulsa.

  • The “now” image of Denver seems to be taken from an opposite point of perspective than the 1976 photo (note how the streetfronts of the spire in the top photo are away from the photographers’ perspective, and in the bottom Google view, you can see the spire’s streetfront). Many of the buildings pictured in the second view look like they also existed in 1976.

    There is a lot of new development in the blocks to the north, though.

  • Yes. Thanks for pointing that out. It’s confusing because there are so few landmarks even in the original photo.

  • Ok, now we changed the orientation to match. Weird shadowy effect, but should be less confusing. Thanks!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

It’s ON! Parking Madness 2014 Kicks Off With Chicago vs. Denver

|
Are you ready for Parking Madness 2014, our second annual search for parking craters that have obliterated cities? You better be. Last year, Tulsa took home the Golden Crater. In this year’s tournament, we broadened the field to accept entries from outside the United States. Perhaps not surprisingly, American parking craters still dominated the reader […]

Parking Madness: Atlanta vs Denver

|
In the race to the bottom that is Parking Madness, Streetsblog’s Sweet 16-style tournament of terrible downtown parking craters, 10 cities have faced off so far. But there are more, so many more awful parking wastelands in otherwise proud American cities. In this post, the match up is Atlanta versus Denver. Remember to cast your […]

Parking Craters Aren’t Just Ugly, They’re a Cancer on Your City’s Downtown

|
Streetsblog’s Parking Madness competition has highlighted the blight that results when large surface parking lots take over a city’s downtown. Even though Rochester, winner of 2014’s Golden Crater, certainly gains bragging rights, all of the competitors have something to worry about: Cumulatively, the past 50 years of building parking have had a debilitating effect on America’s downtowns. […]

Your 2016 Parking Madness Champion Is… Louisville!

|
Streetsblog readers spent the past three weeks voting in Parking Madness, the single elimination tournament where cities compete for the Golden Crater — a symbol of the shameful amount of space we’ve allowed surface parking to consume in our communities. We started with a field of 16 and now we have a champion. The winner of this year’s Golden Crater […]

PM Entries

|
Amarillo, Texas Via Nick Sortland: Amarillo has one sad center for a city, which according to wiki has always had steady population growth, but strangely a very much dying urban center.  I went there once to visit relatives, and all that I can remember is that it was large, flat, and brown.  Even when coming […]