Today’s Headlines

  • Top Dem: Let’s Keep Higher Gas Taxes on the Table (The Hill)
  • Sprawl Boosts Chances of Deadly Tornado Strikes (CBS)
  • Why Buses and Rail Can and Should Coexist (Transport Politic)
  • Lettered New York City Subway Lines Get an “A+” (NYT)
  • Cyclists, Pedestrians Don’t Get Fair Share of Safety Funds (LAB)
  • Study: Men Walking and Biking More, Women Less (AltTransport)
  • Best and Worst Cities for Public Transportation? It’s Complicated… (The Atlantic)
  • Budget Shortfalls Threaten North Carolina Light Rail Extension (Charlotte Observer)
  • What’s the Best Way to Expand Bike-Sharing in DC? (GGW)


Now Arriving: Transit-Oriented Development

Much of the talk on the Streetsblog Network in the past few days, perhaps prompted by the recently concluded Congress for the New Urbanism conference, is about transit-oriented development. The real estate crisis, it seems, may finally be pushing the issue into the mainstream. Photo of housing near a new light rail line by Light […]

In Dallas, Sprawling City Form Hampers Shift to Light Rail

Car-centric Dallas has been making some big strides toward sustainable mobility. Today DART officially opens its new 28-mile Green Line from Carrollton to Southeast Dallas. The expansion makes Dallas’s light rail system the largest in the U.S. But changing travel habits isn’t as easy as building rail infrastructure, the region is finding. Yonah Freemark at […]

Can High-Speed Rail Reduce Air Travel and Highway Expansion?

Yesterday, Miller-McCune’s Michael Scott Moore accused Southwest Airlines of helping to bury a potential Texas bullet train 15 years ago. “Southwest understood better than most high-speed rail critics just how well the trains could work,” Moore wrote. “[High-speed rail in Spain] has reduced Spanish highway traffic — even for cargo, by freeing up space on […]

The Washington Post Features Rail Hack Job

This is the big problem with Ed Glaeser’s New York Times posts purporting to analyze the costs and benefits of a high speed rail system. Despite Glaeser’s acknowledgment that his "back-of-the-envelope calculation" doesn’t "[represent] a complete evaluation of any actual proposed route," the posts are sure to be read and regurgitated by rail opponents uninterested […]