Street Safety Projects Threatened as States Give Transpo $ Back to Feds

It’s payback time again for state DOTs. The fine print on the jobs bill Congress just passed includes a $2.2 billion rescission from state transportation funding, and projects to make biking and walking safer are especially at risk of losing out.

snyder_bike.jpgState DOTs have to return funding to the feds, and programs to improve biking and walking are especially at risk of getting scaled back. Photo: Tanya Snyder

This isn’t coming out of the blue. It’s part of a game Congress played five years back, when they approved more transportation funding than the White House would allow. They left the bigger number in the bill, only to periodically ask the states for some of it back in the form of rescissions. Now is one of those times.

But here’s what’s getting bicycle and transit advocates worried: This time, the money could come disproportionately from bike and pedestrian improvements.

“This is different from the other rescissions in a few ways,” said Caron Whitaker of America Bikes. “One, the other rescissions were subject to a proportionality clause to ensure that certain programs weren’t hit disproportionately, because they had been cut disproportionately in earlier rescissions. Two, this doesn’t cover same breadth of programs as the other ones did.”

Off-limits this time around are funds for the Highway Safety Improvement Program, the Railway-Highway Crossings Program, the Surface Transportation Program, and Safe Routes to Schools.

That means there are fewer programs left on the chopping block, increasing the chances that bicycling and transit programs will be affected — and there are no rules saying state DOTs have to play fair.

That’s what makes this a particularly scary rescission cycle. It’s not the biggest bite — last year states were faced with rescissions four times this size — but some advocates see bull’s-eyes painted on programs that invest in non-automotive modes.

“We’ve seen New York state, for example, rescind a disproportionate amount out of some programs we really like, like CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program) and [transportation] enhancements,” said Michelle Ernst of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign.

The rescinded money comes out of states’ “unobligated balances” — money that’s been authorized but hasn’t been spent yet. Ernst says it makes sense to take it out of the National Highway System instead of bicycle and pedestrian programs. If nothing else, it makes things simpler.

“The other advantage of cutting it from a road program versus a bike program,” Ernst said, “is that bike programs tend to be much less expensive. So you may have to cut or postpone ten separate bike projects in order to meet that rescission, whereas maybe you have to postpone just one road project.”

The feds are encouraging state DOTs to listen to stakeholders when making these hard decisions. Local bicycle advocacy groups, like WABA in Washington, DC, are trying to make sure their voices are heard.

“There is direction from Federal Highway to the states encouraging outreach to stakeholders, but not requiring,” says WABA Director Shane Farthing. “People should contact state level DOT folks and their governor or mayor.”

Time is of the essence. States have only until August 25 to decide what stays and what goes.

  • Maggie

    FYI there are a handfull of states (Colorado is one) that currently cut bicycle related programs less than other programs at rescission time. Be sure that you check with your state advocacy group before contacting your DOT to ensure that you aren’t essentially asking for less money for bicycling by demanding equal cuts.

  • Mark Walker

    We can’t afford to invest in the future, so let’s invest in the past. When the peak oil crisis really hits, there will be horrendous suffering, but that won’t happen this year so it’s OK.

  • smushmoth

    Nice photo, notice the green light for the cross traffic, this means the cyclist is either about to stop in the crosswalk or run the light.

  • Michael

    @smushmoth: …or make a totally legal right turn on red. They’re also on a fixed gear, so they might just be balancing in place.

  • Good project managers usually take into account possible rescissions in their cost estimates. This, however, seems like an extreme cut in available funding which may seriously impact good projects.

  • Adam

    Funny that an article about state DOT’s is illustrated with a photo of Washington, DC (!6th St. at U St. and New Hampshire Ave.), which isn’t in a state…

  • jeff

    DC receives federal transportation funding and faces rescissions like everyone else. Our one non-voting representative can’t fight other state’s elected morons with the power so don’t blame us.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Boxer Pushes LaHood on Financing for Transportation

|
Senator Barbara Boxer got down to brass tacks on transportation funding in a committee hearing yesterday, even as DOT Secretary Ray LaHood remained vague on how to pay for the president’s ambitious proposal. Boxer said she’s not in favor of raising the gas tax, but she’d like it to be indexed to inflation. “We don’t […]

To Change Your Community’s Streets, the Action Is in the Statehouse

|
Anxious about Congress messing up the federal transportation bill? There’s a lot at stake in Washington, but consider this: 78 percent of transportation funds come from the state and local levels. At a National Bike Summit panel yesterday on state-level bike advocacy campaigns, Dan Grunig of Bicycle Colorado spoke about the importance of reforming the agencies […]

The Best and Worst of the New 5-Year Transportation Bill

|
Smart people are wading through the 1,300-page transportation bill that came out of conference committee earlier this week, and we’re starting to get a clearer sense of how it will change federal transportation policy for the next five years. The House voted to pass the bill by an overwhelming margin just moments ago, and President Obama has already […]