Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Bicycling

Trump’s Tariff War Creates Existential Challenges — And One Upside — For the Bike Industry

...and it could make it a lot harder to get a new helmet, too.

The trade war with China could wipe out Americans' ability to buy bikes, bike components, and even the helmets they need to ride safely, according to the trade association representing the industry — unless President Trump gives manufacturers more time and support to bring production back on shore.

A coalition of bike companies led by the nonprofit PeopleForBikes sent the president a letter today asking him to exclude bike-related imports from his proposed tariffs on China, which they argue could still devastate an industry despite recent negotiations that have driven tariff levels down.

That's because the bike sector has been forced to depend so heavily on foreign trade over the years that around 97.8 percent of all bikes sold today are imported from abroad — with the vast majority of those shipments coming from China itself.

While "America once made all of the bicycles that we need," the group wrote, policymakers failed to fight back a flood of cheap bikes from overseas that gradually put domestic manufacturers out of business.

That decades-long cascade of policy failures forced U.S. bike companies to source most of the 200 or so parts in each vehicle from manufacturers in foreign countries, pushing the industry to its limits even before Trump sparked a trade war with their primary suppliers.

Today, even critical (and often, legally required) bicycle safety accessories like helmets are overwhelmingly produced overseas, as are necessary ones like bike pumps, and even bike shorts. On many bikes, only the seat post is reliably American-made.

Trump's originally proposed tariffs on bike components and accessories.Graphic: PeopleForBikes

That dependency means that rather than creating new American jobs as Trump intended, the threat of tariffs has U.S.-based bike companies contemplating additional layoffs and even outright closures — "including some of our few remaining domestic manufacturers" and companies that assemble bikes on U.S. soil.

"We are working with members of Congress to create an environment of domestic manufacturing, but this initiative will take many years and significant financial investments," the group wrote, likely in reference to a 2024 bill that would bolster the U.S. bike industry through tax credits and other initiatives. "In the meantime, our industry urgently needs tariff relief in order to marshal the resources needed to continue moving our supply chains, including to the United States."

Notably, the American bike industry isn't necessarily looking for all bike tariffs to be eliminated.

The Coalition actually praised Trump for closing the infamous de minimis loophole, which previously allowed foreign sellers to sell and ship bikes under $800 without paying any tariffs, collecting any sales taxes for states, or subjecting their products to critical safety inspections even on safety equipment like helmets.

That gaping loophole has proved particularly devastating in the e-bike market, whose overall reputation has been stained by the infusion of cheap, exploding batteries from overseas that are not subject to the same rigorous certification standards as imported bikes that cost more. While the specific amount of the tariff on ultra-cheap goods is still being ironed out, the Coalition is grateful that bad actors will now be forced to at least pay something.

"We appreciate your focus on China's competitive threat and are especially thankful for your leadership in closing the de minimis loophole, which has undermined the U.S. bicycle industry and local bike retailers across America for many years," the letter stated.

If Trump can finish the job of protecting the American bike industry by excluding basic components from tariffs — something they point out he already did once during his first term, the last time he tackled global trade — PeopleForBikes argues that he could protect a "quintessential American industry" and the many jobs that come with it.

And while President Trump might not agree with the importance of displacing car trips with bike trips, it might also keep U.S. residents in the saddle, especially among "price-sensitive riders" like young people, families, and low-income residents.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Buenos Aires Will Challenge Everything You Think You Know About Buses

The Paris of South America has an amazing bus system — but it doesn't run like North American ones at all.

March 13, 2026

Friday’s Headlines Change How We Keep Score

The way the U.S. measures traffic death rates skews public perception toward the status quo.

March 13, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Buildings are Here to Help People

Jeremy Wells on his book, Managing the Magic of Old Places: Crafting Public Policies for People-Centered Historic Preservation.

March 12, 2026

Bus Companies Say There’s a Better Way to Take a ‘Great American Road Trip’ This Summer

"Our eventual goal is to make inter-city bus travel every American's first consideration when they think about how to get from one city to the next."

March 12, 2026

Opinion: Make This Summer’s World Cup A Car-Free Paradise

NYC has a major opportunity to support people who don't drive during the World Cup. Could other host cities do it, too?

March 12, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines Can’t Keep Up

While other developed nations are building more transit lines as their populations increase, the U.S. is not.

March 12, 2026
See all posts