Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Climate Change

Duke Climate Scientist Criticizes the University’s Light Rail Obstructionism

Light rail between Chapel Hill and Durham, North Carolina, is expected to draw 26,000 riders a day. Image: Triangle Transit

Scores of Duke University faculty members are demanding that the institution abandon its threat to kill a 17-mile light rail line linking UNC-Chapel Hill, Duke, downtown Durham and N.C. Central University

Duke's Board of Trustees will vote on Thursday whether to allow construction of the $3.3-billion Durham-Orange light rail line to continue through campus. A negative vote would cause the long-planned project to miss a federal deadline, likely sinking it. This week, 51 faculty and staff members signed an open letter in the student newspaper, the Chronicle, demanding support for the transit project — especially given that the university claims it is committed to combatting climate change.

"The university has a plan to become carbon neutral and one of the areas that [need] the most progress is transportation, with all the employees driving to work," Earth Sciences Professor Drew Shindell, one of the letter signers, told Streetsblog. "This is a way to really tackle the problem."

The News Observer chronicled Duke's long, evolving list of mostly petty objections to the 17.7-mile light rail project. The paper noted that Duke has put "one hurdle after another in the path of light rail," including concerns about traffic, alleged tree damage and even protecting views of an on-campus golf course.

Drew Shindell, earth sciences professor at Duke University. Photo: Duke
Drew Shindell, earth sciences professor at Duke University. Photo: Duke
Drew Shindell, earth sciences professor at Duke University. Photo: Duke

Project leaders from the light rail agency GoTriangle say they have worked hard to meet the university half way. For example, to quiet concerns Duke officials had about electric power connections with Duke Medical Center, GoTriangle added a $90-million elevated portion for the light rail.

But despite regional planning meetings going to 2015, Duke President Vincent Price told the News Observer that he had too many concerns to move forward. University officials claim construction and operation of the light rail line will cause vibrations that will impair operations at Duke Medical Center.

The University wanted a $1 billion insurance policy against that possibility. Now, they university is asking for a $2 billion insurance policy against light rail vibrations interfering with hospital operations.

Duke's Public Affairs office did not respond to Streetsblog's request for comment.

Shindell, whose research focuses on the air quality and climate impacts of power generation and transportation decisions, said he doesn't have any inside information about why the university is impeding the project. But he thinks University leadership is intensely focused on the everyday minutia of managing various facilities.

"Their job is not to pay attention to the big picture," Shindell said. "Duke says they care about the community and says they care about the environment and yet they throw out all these road blocks at the last minute to something everyone in the community says they want.

"It would be a hugely beneficial thing to our whole region," he added. "People are constantly locked in traffic jams on I-40 and it’s just going to get worse all the time."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Agenda 2026: Will Zohran Mamdani’s Left-Progressive Backers Mobilize for Faster Buses?

New York's new mayor must mobilize the coalition that got him elected if he wants to avoid his recent predecessors' failure to speed up buses.

December 2, 2025

Opinion: One Less Lane Ought To Fix It

Federal inaction means states must lead on reducing emissions — but their reluctance to reallocate road space for cars may doom climate goals.

December 2, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Fight Fire With Fire

Berkeley, Calif., is far from the only city where the fire department dictates transportation policy.

December 2, 2025

Investigation: How Trump’s U.S. DOT Is Loosening Safety Rules Meant to Protect the Public

In Trump’s second term, the agency opened 50-percent fewer investigations into vehicle safety defects, concluded 83-percent fewer enforcement cases against trucking and bus companies and started 58-percent fewer pipeline enforcement cases compared with the same period in the Biden administration.

December 1, 2025

Monday’s Headlines Go Cold Turkey

Life is a highway, and Congress is going to ride it all night long.

December 1, 2025

OPINION: Where Cities are Investing, Vision Zero is Working 

As the Vision Zero Network turns 10, it's time to look at what works and what is achievable (a lot!).

November 28, 2025
See all posts