Can New Mobility Tech Disrupt Car Dependence?

Bike Walk Nashville actually held a class instructing people on how to scoot safely. Photo: Bike Walk Nashville
Bike Walk Nashville actually held a class instructing people on how to scoot safely. Photo: Bike Walk Nashville

Tech companies like Uber and Bird are disrupting transportation in cities with the promise of actually helping them become more sustainable and less over-reliant on cars. But will they?

A new organization, New Urban Mobility, which goes by the acronym NUMO, wants to help city leaders make sure.

Robin Chase 2013
Robin Chase

Launching on Wednesday, the group aims to be “gap fillers,” says Executive Chairwoman Robin Chase, providing policy support, or leading engagement to advance 10 “shared mobility principles” aimed at promoting a more sustainable and people-oriented urban transportation systems.

The organization will have seven employees in Washington D.C. We reached out to Chase, best known as the founder of Zipcar, to get the gist (interview lighted edited for length and clarity):

Streetsblog: What was the impetus for this organization?

Robin Chase: All these new urban mobility options … are causing a huge disruption in the sector. Everything is in flux. It’s causing cities and the people who live in them to have to rethink what the status quo looks like. We haven’t felt such disruption in 100 years. We have this unique moment to rethink what our priorities are. 

Cars and parked cars and car taxation and car regulation … all of that is so built into the status quo that people can’t see it. They can’t envision what an alternative world would look like.

We as an urban mobility field, as an entire planet, need to get on the same page about where we are going. NUMO is an effort to convene those stakeholders that share that vision together to work at a much faster pace.

At the core it’s about creating joyful, sustainable and just cities.

Streetsblog: What makes this organization different than the existing national transportation policy nonprofits, including the National Association of City Transportation Officials or Transportation for America?

Chase: Those organizations have produced some great blueprints or guidelines, for complete streets, or for micro-mobility. Some of that work we want to elevate. Those groups are mostly focused on policy push. But there’s an inadequate demand pull. There’s inadequate work with people who live in cities, to make them see where there’s a future that works better for them. How do we activate them more?

In many cities, there are two very loud voices: Car owners and would-be cyclists, and more specifically cycling advocates, which is a very small number. There are many, many more stakeholders and interests involved whose voices are not heard. 

We are going to be more focused on convening and elevating of best practices. Where are there research gaps? Where are their policy gaps that we can bring people together and help fill? We are very focused on tech-driven disruptions, including on-demand delivery. 

Streetsblog: Are you receiving any money from tech companies?

Chase: Not right now. We’re intending to be an independent voice.

Streetsblog: Can you explain the shared mobility principles a little bit more?

Chase: One of them, for example, is “Focus on moving people not cars.” Another is “Making efficient use of our streets, curbs, vehicles, lanes.” “Choose more efficient means over inefficient means” and “Fair users fees across all modes.” 

Cities have a lot of taxation that doesn’t provide a level playing field. What are shared bike systems’ business models? One of the reasons shared bikes have a hard time making money is we’re letting cars pollute for free. We have unequal fees for all modes. We have unequal distribution of space for all modes.

Another principle is “equitable access for all.”

These principles are aspirational for every city in the world. None of us is doing a good job. 

Which cities are ripe? We want to be the gap filler.

Where are there mayors that are champions? Were are there policy discussions? What can we do that will help it over the line?

More information is available at NUMO’s website, which launched today.

8 thoughts on Can New Mobility Tech Disrupt Car Dependence?

  1. Disrupt car ownership, perhaps in limited cases, but disrupting car use, yes, to a far greater degree.

  2. The problem is land use. Scooters are for shorter trips. As long as cities are sprawled out, short range transportation won’t change car use.

  3. As a single occupant super-commuting driver, I support the principals. Specifically, if cities allow highway-capable cars in their neighborhoods, then a transition from highway-capable side-seated cars to highway-capable single-width cars should be strongly encouraged and supported to mitigate traffic congestion and air pollution, and increase transit desert commuting options.

  4. More reason to aggressively enforce a city-wide speed limit of 20-25 MPH. No road re-design needed and more revenue for cities! $$$$$$$$$$$$

    Scooters can then travel as any other motorized vehicle

  5. Essentially, bicycles were once thought to effectively disrupt car culture, but now it seems disruption is too dangerous because cops are too lazy to stop speeding and/or use traffic enforcement as a political weapon against the city administration.

    The bike crowd now want protected bike lanes. I see the same for scooters, or maybe they’ll just collide with bikes in the bike lane? Or even more probably, with pedestrians on the sidewalk pedestrian lane.

  6. Staying home works for some folks, but unfortunately I have to commute to a job, and that’s why I endorse narrow cars as the key solution for right-sizing and right-pricing city and rural transportation. I spoke with Robin Chase at a shared mobility conference. Had I stayed home, I wouldn’t have learned that she recommended narrow lanes to a highway commission which is very much in line with the technology I endorse in my posts. I also participated in the crowd sourcing that preceded the announcement of the shared mobility principals. How are you duly invested in this topic?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

A New Partnership to Help Cities Make Smart Transportation Tech Decisions

|
There’s a rush in cities to apply new transportation technologies like ride-sharing apps and real-time transit data, as exemplified by U.S. DOT’s $50 million “Smart City Challenge,” which is currently down to seven finalists. Public and private entities in Columbus, for example, recently pledged $90 million to help advance the city’s bid to U.S. DOT. But are cities well-equipped to navigate […]

Streetsblog Thursday Job Market

|
Looking to hire a smart, qualified person for a position in transportation planning, engineering, IT, or advocacy? Post a listing on the Streetsblog Jobs Board and reach our national audience of dedicated readers. We’re giving employers free listings, normally a $50 value, through the end of the summer. Looking for a job? Here are this […]

Mobility as a Basic Human Right

|
Advocates of sustainable transportation are sometimes charged with elitism and criticized for being out of touch with the mainstream of America. A new exhibit of photographs showing in Los Angeles, "Without a Car in the World: 100 Car-Less Angelenos Tell Stories of Living in LA," graphically makes the point that the people who have the […]