Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Buffalo

Buffalo Advocates Convince New York DOT to Rethink a Half-Baked Highway Removal

Buffalo’s Scajaquada Expressway sliced through a beautiful park designed by Frederick Law Olmsted. Photos: Scajaquada Corridor Coalition

The Scajaquada Corridor project was supposed to be a highway removal that would reconnect Buffalo residents with beautiful Delaware Park. The park is part of the public space network designed for Buffalo by revered landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted. The construction of the expressway in the 1940s severely diminished it.

So why are locals cheering after New York State DOT announced yesterday that it's putting a stop to the removal project?

The answer, in short, is that the state DOT's plan didn't do enough for walking, biking, and overall safety.

"They finally scrapped their bad plan," said Justin Booth, director of the advocacy group GObike Buffalo. "And it gives us a redo option."

There were a number of problems with the state DOT's approach, said Booth, starting with the decision to prioritize fast car traffic in the new design.

Intersection designs like this were not acceptable to Buffalo residents. Via Scajaquada Corridor Coalition
Intersection designs like this were not acceptable to Buffalo residents. Via Scajaquada Corridor Coalition
Intersection designs like this were not acceptable to Buffalo residents. Via Scajaquada Corridor Coalition

Rather than replacing the Scajaquada with a walkable boulevard, the state DOT called for some intersections to be seven to nine lanes wide, including turn lanes -- creating intimidating and dangerous crossings for pedestrians.

State officials were also wedded to the idea of a center-running median, while locals preferred to see that space dedicated to usable park space. And locals wanted to convert the historic Stone Arch Bridge, currently part of the Scajaquada, to a car-free route for walking and biking, with a new street segment functioning as a bypass (see rendering below), but the state didn't incorporate that idea.

Advocates envisioned a bike-and-pedestrian-only Stone Arch Bridge. But NYSDOT balked. Image: Olmsted Park Conservancy via
Advocates envisioned a bike-and-pedestrian-only Stone Arch Bridge. But NYSDOT balked. Image: Olmsted Park Conservancy via Buffalo Rising
Advocates envisioned a bike-and-pedestrian-only Stone Arch Bridge. But NYSDOT balked. Image: Olmsted Park Conservancy via

In addition, advocates like Booth were frustrated about the lack of protected bike lanes. "The DOT was only offering a wide shoulder for bike facilities," he said.

In its design critique, the Scajaquada Corridor Coalition said the state DOT's plan was "worse than what is there now, which is pretty bad."

The Olmsted Parks Conservatory gathered 5,500 signatures calling for the state to abandon its plan. Announcing their decision to start over, state officials noted yesterday that two-thirds of public comments had been opposed to the project.

Now that the state DOT is going back to the drawing board, three state lawmakers have pledged to keep the process moving with fresh designs that better reflect the public's aspirations, reports the Buffalo News.

State Assemblyman Sean Ryan told reporters that the withdrawal of the state's plan should not require another lengthy study period.

The Scajaquada Corridor Coalition and advocates like Booth are cheering the state DOT's willingness to rethink its approach.

"We’re happy to have an opportunity to restart the conversation," he said.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s Wednesday’s Headlines

Is our Jetsons future is finally upon us? Plus, a new and better way to measure streets' level of service.

September 17, 2025

Op-Ed: Congress Has A Big Opportunity to Connect America By Intercity Bus

The next federal transportation bill could be a chance to connect rural America with buses like never before — and it will have spillover benefits nationwide, the CEO of one top bus company argues.

September 17, 2025

Breaking: US DOT Pulls Grants For Projects That Aren’t Focused on Cars

The Trump administration bias for "vehicular travel" — and the burning of fossil fuels that it requires — rears its ugly head again.

September 16, 2025

Seattle’s Human Population Is Up, But Its Car Population Isn’t

Urbanists have long been making that case that growth in Seattle is the most climate-friendly and easiest to support with transit and infrastructure. And it's happening.

September 16, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Stay Safe

Political rhetoric notwithstanding, you're much safer on a bus or a train than in a car, or walking or biking near cars.

September 16, 2025
See all posts