- Portland Seeks Public Input on MAX Southwest Corridor Light Rail (Tribune)
- Albuquerque BRT Will Be Running by the End of the Month (KOB)
- Milwaukee Holds Meetings to Discuss Streetcar Extensions (urbanmilwaukee)
- New Group Forms to Build Support for Omaha Streetcar (North Platte Telegraph)
- Cleveland Ruling on Transit Fare Checks Could Affect Pittsburgh, Too (Post-Gazette)
- Auto-Centric Cities Are Discriminatory, Expensive, and Unhealthy (Strong Towns)
- Bikelash Strikes in Southwest Baltimore (WBAL)
- Pittsburgh Steeler JuJu Smith-Schuster Is a Bike Advocate (Grist)
- New York Is the Road-Ragiest City, Based on Instagram Hashtags (WaPo)
- New Bike-Share Roundup: Montgomery County, MD (Post), Tucson, AZ (News Now), Lancaster, PA (LancasterOnline), Santa Cruz, CA (Sentinel), Eugene, OR (Daily Emerald), Furman University (Greenville Journal) and Bloomington, IN (News Tribune)
Today's Headlines
Today’s Headlines
By Blake Aued
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Talking Headways Podcast: Getting California High Speed Rail Done
It took a while, but California is figuring out the best, most-cost-effective way to do fast trains.
October 30, 2025
Spooky Stuff: On Halloween, Some States Will Have Deadlier Roads Than Others
Find out how yours ranks — and what policymakers can do to make streets less scary.
October 30, 2025
Who Are Thursday’s Headlines For?
Non-drivers still perceive streets as being for cars even when they have bike lanes. And that's because, in many cases, they are.
October 30, 2025
An Olympian Task: Replicating Paris’s Bike Boom in Los Angeles
The Olympics can help transform the streets of Los Angeles — if they look to the example of Paris.
October 29, 2025
Wednesday’s Headlines Are a Clear and Present Danger
Rescinding the "endangerment finding" could not only exacerbate climate change, it could also throw entire industries into chaos.
October 29, 2025
What’s More Regressive: Modest Driving Surcharges to Help Fund Transit, or Forced Car Ownership?
Do Illinois state senators and reps really want to make the financial burden on their constituents less "regressive"? If so they can start by ensuring that as many people as possible can live their lives without spending $12,000 annually just to leave their homes.
