Portland’s on the Verge of Fending Off Two Highway Widening Projects

I-5 in Portland is one of the two urban highways that won't be getting widened after all. Photo: BikePortland
I-5 in Portland is one of the two urban highways that won't be getting widened after all. Photo: BikePortland

We know that highway expansions increase traffic and fuel sprawl — and that cities can thrive without them. But highway widening projects still have a way of rearing their ugly heads in 2017, even where you least expect them. In Portland, two road expansions with a combined pricetag of $1 billion seemed to be on the fast track for funding this year, with transit agency boss Neil McFarlane and city DOT chief Leah Treat lining up behind them, in addition to the usual road-building suspects.

But it looks like the highway expansions are toast, at least for now.

The projects were part of a big transportation package that state lawmakers have been trying to hammer out. Jeff Mapes and Chris Lehman at Oregon Public Broadcasting report that negotiators have stripped the two highway widenings from the package.

It wasn’t just opposition to highways that sank the projects. The votes to raise the gas tax and vehicle sales fees necessary to fund the widenings weren’t there, Mapes and Lehman report:

“They’ve been removed,” Clackamas County Chairman Jim Bernard said of the I-5 and 1-205 projects, which together would cost about $1 billion. He said that the bill would include funding for a smaller freeway project to add lanes on Highway 217 in Washington County…

Supporters have said the projects would relieve key bottlenecks in the Portland area, and the legislation sought to tie them to tolling that would also help manage congestion. Not everyone favored the projects. Some critics have said the region should look at other transportation alternatives instead of spending so much on freeways…

The legislation reportedly still includes provisions allowing planning to go forward on the two freeway projects. And it calls for the state Department of Transportation to study whether it can soon move forward with the I-205 project by relying more on tolls.

The package also includes $100 million in addition support for transit statewide, which Governor Kate Brown says is a first for Oregon. Kudos to those who fought for a more sustainable, less wasteful future for the region.

More recommended reading today: Bike Portland reports that the city is issuing grants of up to $20,000 to neighborhoods for small-scale streets projects like bike corrals or painted crosswalks. And Systemic Failure says American civil engineers should broaden their horizons and learn best practices that come from outside our borders.

8 thoughts on Portland’s on the Verge of Fending Off Two Highway Widening Projects

  1. So Oregon is basically dysfunctional much like our federal gov’t? They merely need to look north, south and east for examples of moving forward. State of Washington added nearly $billion per year to their state DOT in 2015

  2. Living here, I can tell you these don’t make sense. I-5 widening, especially, is just dumb. Without added capacity crossing into WA, adding lanes near the Rose Quarter just clears out that bottleneck and pushes it north. It’s like widening a hose in the middle but keeping the spigot the same size. That was crappy $ spent. I-205 is already wide and, well, just a mess. That area of town needs more transit – badly – and they have asked for lots of it – often – so money seems better spent improving the network and less on roads.

  3. Of course adding lanes increases traffic, it encourages people to get off the surface streets and makes them safer for bikes, and allows transit to function more consistently.

  4. I-205 is already wide? Maybe up in Portland it is, but Oregon City to I-5 in Tualatin is just four lanes, two in each direction.

    Same highway capacity as I-84 in Pendleton. A LOT more traffic. Absolutely, positively ZERO transit. None. Zip. Zero. Unless you want to take two hours and go through downtown Portland.

  5. And if widening 217 doesn’t make sense…justify WES. $200 million and virtually nothing to show for it – pathetic miserable low ridership, extremely high operating costs, and TriMet had to cut bus service in order to pay for it (and lost more bus riders than it gained in WES).

    And guess what? Despite 36 daily trains, WES is still empty and 217 is still gridlocked.

  6. Those interchanges are dangerous. It would save lives to fix them. However, that doesn’t seem to matter.

  7. adding lanes increases traffic, just as true is …

    taking away lanes on I-5 to reduce traffic — cut I-5 from 3 lanes north to 1 and watch all the congenstion disappear!!!

    so goes the idiotic thinking of the left

  8. forget about the rose qtr — its only about 5 to 10 miles to vancouver…

    the real congestion is I-5 going south – every day it is a parking lot from downtown pdx to willsonville

    soon the traffic will bleed onto the surface streets and nobody will go anywhere

    which will induce demand for close in housing –watch you rent go from 14 hundrend to 34 hundred – just because of induced demand caused by traffic congestion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Portland Shows How to Get More Bang for Your Traffic Safety Buck

State DOTs like to justify hugely expensive highway-widening projects, like Milwaukee’s $1.7 billion Zoo Interchange, partly on the grounds of safety. But if we really want to get a big bang for our transportation safety buck, fixing city streets makes a lot more sense. Michael Andersen at Bike Portland reports that three local road diets completed […]

The Complete Case Against Highway Widening in Detroit

Michigan DOT wants to spend $1 billion rebuilding and widening I-75 to Detroit’s sprawling northern suburbs, at the expense of the city and close-in suburbs. Royal Oak, a walkable suburb that borders the city, is not having it. The City Council passed a resolution unanimously this week officially opposing the widening of I-75 as well as […]