Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Who Needs a “Straddling Bus” When Bus Lanes Have Already Been Invented?

It's not even a new idea at this point, having made the rounds in the media about six years ago, but the "straddling bus" concept that some Chinese cities are purportedly considering continues to fascinate people. Straddling bus stories went viral again last week, with claims that the conveyance, which only exists as a scale model at this point, can carry up to 1,400 passengers while traveling above two lanes of car traffic as fast as 40 mph, according to CityLab.

Is a bus that allows cars to pass under it a solution for congestion? Photo via Human Transit
Guaranteed to work brilliantly in real life.
false

Is this idea worth taking beyond the tiny model phase? Nope, says Canaan Merchant at Greater Greater Washington:

We don't need the straddle bus to get rid of congestion. The solution already exists: Rather than building an eight-lane highway and running a futuristic moving tunnel with seats on top over it, let's just give two of those lanes to regular buses and watch congestion go down.

It can sometimes be far too easy to forget about the tools we already have at our disposal, instead pushing for new inventions and technology to revolutionize how we travel. The hyperloop will supposedly get us across California in 30 minutes, and Personal Rapid Transit will apparently be devoid of all the pitfalls that doomed the Columbia Pike Streetcar.

But we already have what we need. We can build bus lanes and bike lanes, and do more to encourage people to drive less rather than give them options for driving more. We don't have to become the Jetsons to solve the problem.

Jarrett Walker at Human Transit concurs:

If your starting point for urban design is that single-occupant cars, despite their extreme inefficiency in using scarce urban space, should be allowed to go anywhere at all, and that the surface plane should be designed solely for their convenience to the exclusion of all other citizens and needs, then this technology makes sense.

Elsewhere on the Network today: The Urbanist considers how to make the most out of the 35 percent of Seattle's land area that is devoted to streets and sidewalks. And Plan Philly reports that the City of Brotherly Love is going to allow developers to build taller buildings -- if they include space for a fresh food vendor.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Commentary: Illinois’s Transit Funding Flop Is a Cautionary Tale

Not funding transit agencies' basic operating needs is a political loser in any state.

June 3, 2025

Car Harms Series: NYC’s ‘Gridlock Sam’ Says We Have Lost Our Lives to the Automobile

Take it from the former head of New York's Department of Traffic: If we restore valuable public space to the people, the result will be a healthier, happier, and more humane city.

June 3, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Come Here, Rude Boy

Pro tip from a University of Liverpool researcher: If you contact your local government to support bike lanes, be nice!

June 3, 2025

Free Public Transportation: a Postcard from Montpellier

The french city Montpellier has offered free transit fares since December 2023. Could it be an inspiration for the United States?

June 3, 2025

One Structural Change Could Shift Everything About How Transportation Works in America

The so-called "highway trust fund" is disproportionately funded by gas taxes generated on non-highway roads — and those local priorities never get their money back. Is it time for a change?

June 2, 2025
See all posts