Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Why One Street Safety Advocate Will Never Go to a DOT Meeting Again

Residents in Saint Paul devoted devoted hundreds of hours to developing this multi-modal plan for Snelling Avenue, only to have huge portions of it thrown out without notice or explanation. Image: Streets.mn
Residents in Saint Paul worked with Minnesota DOT to include safety improvements for biking and walking in this plan for Snelling Avenue, only to have huge portions of it thrown out without notice or explanation. Image: Streets.mn
false

Public meetings hosted by state DOTs can be very frustrating. People who want safer streets and take the time to attend are often deluged with highly technical excuses about why their suggestions won't fly.

Andy Singer at Streets.mn, known for his excellent cartoon work, says he's done for good. He's never attending another Minnesota DOT meeting after devoting "at least 100 hours" to what was supposed to be a "multi-modal" plan for Saint Paul's Snelling Avenue -- one of the most dangerous corridors in the Twin Cities region.

Real design improvements came out of the workshops -- at first. Then Singer says his faith in the process was betrayed when the state DOT ditched large portions of the plan with no explanation or notice:

A plan is a promise from a government agency that it is going to do certain things for the community. I and other community members invested thousands of hours of our time in a good-faith effort to come up with the Multi-Modal Plan. By throwing out large portions of it, MnDOT wasted our time, betrayed our trust, and wasted public money.

As they’ve been doing for over seventy years, MnDOT demonstrated that they simply don’t care about public opinion or the communities through which their enormously destructive highways pass. They constantly solicit public feedback for plans like this, or for “Minnesota Go”, or their statewide bike/pedestrian plans. In fact, it seems like their bike/ped division has done nothing for the last twenty years except draft plans that are never implemented.

We sit in rooms with facilitators and stick post-it notes on maps, or watch presentations about "how much the agency cares about our input," and break into meaningless little discussion groups. In retrospect, it all appears to have been a waste of time, and I will never go to a meeting with MnDOT again. It’s like when politicians appoint a “Blue Ribbon Panel” and then ignore its recommendations. After a few of these, people stop participating because they realize it’s pointless.

Elsewhere on the Network today: The City Fix shares research about the effect of Bogotá’s TransMilenio BRT on public health. And Cyclelicious reports that Oklahoma is considering "Idaho Stop"-style legislation.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday’s Headlines Got Served

Another day, another GOP lawsuit trying to overturn a Biden administration climate change rule.

April 19, 2024

Disabled People Are Dying in America’s Crosswalks — But We’re Not Counting Them

The data on traffic fatalities and injuries doesn’t account for their needs or even count them. Better data would enable better solutions.

April 19, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Charging Up Transportation

This week, we talk to the great Gabe Klein, executive director of President Biden's Joint Office of Energy and Transportation (and a former Streetsblog board member), about curbside electrification.

April 18, 2024

Why Does the Vision Zero Movement Stop At the Edge of the Road?

U.S. car crash deaths are nearly 10 percent higher if you count collisions that happen just outside the right of way. So why don't off-road deaths get more air time among advocates?

April 18, 2024

Donald Shoup: Here’s a Parking Policy That Works for the People

Free parking has a veneer of equality, but it is unfair. Here's a proposal from America's leading parking academic that could make it more equitable.

April 18, 2024
See all posts