Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Proposed changes to parking requirements for residential developments in Minneapolis. Image: Streets.mn
Proposed changes to parking requirements for residential developments in Minneapolis. Image: Streets.mn
false

Whether you own a car or not, if you live in a city, there's a good chance you pay for parking. Building parking spots is expensive, but most cities require developers to build a certain amount of parking per residence, driving up the cost of housing.

Nick Magrino at Streets.mn reports that Minneapolis is rethinking that approach, and may drop parking minimums for residential developments near bus and rail stations.

Since the 1960s, the City of Minneapolis has required off-street parking for new residential buildings. There are recently enacted exceptions in downtown and university area neighborhoods, but the current requirement across most of the city is one parking space per unit. A great deal of the city was built before the 1960s, and much of it is still there -- that area is grandfathered in. You can’t build a neighborhood like Loring Park or Stevens Square anymore. Much of the current, subtle density of South Minneapolis would be unbuildable as of right.

Next week, the Minneapolis City Planning Commission will be considering a proposal to reduce or eliminate off-street parking requirements for residential developments along bus and rail transit lines. This proposal would eliminate all minimum off-street parking requirements for residential developments very close to high-frequency transit stops.

Magrino says the proposed changes have the potential to foster new walkable development. "Reducing minimum off-street parking requirements along transit routes would test the market for buildings similar to what we have and already like all across the city," he writes. "The proposed changes don’t compel anyone to build a project a certain way, they just give builders the option."

Also on the Network today: Twin City Sidewalks on the false choice between successful businesses and bike infrastructure; TheCityFix reports that Google has created a new company to "improve" cities; and People for Bikes says Birmingham, Alabama, will be the first city in North America to use electric-assist bike-share bikes.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Amtrak Is Way More Successful Than You Think

Why do so many people still treat Amtrak as a failure — and what would it take to deliver the rail investment that American riders deserve?

October 24, 2025

Friday’s Headlines Are Hanging Out Down the Street

The same old thing we did last week — until the neighbor wrote a letter to the editor.

October 24, 2025

Report: Lessons from California’s HSR Project

A new paper from the Mineta Institute looks at California's high-speed rail project—and how to do better moving forward.

October 23, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: Life After Cars

Sarah Goodyear and Doug Gordon of The War on Cars podcast on their new book, opposing views, Turtle Jesus and potential off-ramps towards car-free cities.

October 23, 2025

Traffic Congestion Is a Housing and Transit Problem, Not a Highway Problem

To truly solve tangled traffic in California (and across the U.S.), we need to take the problem out of the hands of the road builders and address the root causes of congestion: building more affordable housing near jobs and improving public transportation options.

October 23, 2025

Truckers Back NYC Busway Plan That Trump Blocked

The federal government has obviously lost its trucking mind.

October 23, 2025
See all posts