Skip to content

Minneapolis May Drop Parking Minimums Near Transit

Whether you own a car or not, if you live in a city, there's a good chance you pay for parking. Building parking spots is expensive, but most cities require developers to build a certain amount of parking per residence, driving up the cost of housing.
Proposed changes to parking requirements for residential developments in Minneapolis. Image: Streets.mn
Proposed changes to parking requirements for residential developments in Minneapolis. Image: Streets.mn

Whether you own a car or not, if you live in a city, there’s a good chance you pay for parking. Building parking spots is expensive, but most cities require developers to build a certain amount of parking per residence, driving up the cost of housing.

Nick Magrino at Streets.mn reports that Minneapolis is rethinking that approach, and may drop parking minimums for residential developments near bus and rail stations.

Since the 1960s, the City of Minneapolis has required off-street parking for new residential buildings. There are recently enacted exceptions in downtown and university area neighborhoods, but the current requirement across most of the city is one parking space per unit. A great deal of the city was built before the 1960s, and much of it is still there — that area is grandfathered in. You can’t build a neighborhood like Loring Park or Stevens Square anymore. Much of the current, subtle density of South Minneapolis would be unbuildable as of right.

Next week, the Minneapolis City Planning Commission will be considering a proposal to reduce or eliminate off-street parking requirements for residential developments along bus and rail transit lines. This proposal would eliminate all minimum off-street parking requirements for residential developments very close to high-frequency transit stops.

Magrino says the proposed changes have the potential to foster new walkable development. “Reducing minimum off-street parking requirements along transit routes would test the market for buildings similar to what we have and already like all across the city,” he writes. “The proposed changes don’t compel anyone to build a project a certain way, they just give builders the option.”

Also on the Network today: Twin City Sidewalks on the false choice between successful businesses and bike infrastructure; TheCityFix reports that Google has created a new company to “improve” cities; and People for Bikes says Birmingham, Alabama, will be the first city in North America to use electric-assist bike-share bikes.

Photo of Brad Aaron
Brad Aaron began writing for Streetsblog in 2007, after years as a reporter, editor, and publisher in the alternative weekly business. Brad adopted New York'’s dysfunctional traffic justice system as his primary beat for Streetsblog. He lives in Manhattan.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog USA

Chicago to St. Louis Is the High-Speed Rail Test America Can’t Afford to Fail

March 31, 2026

Trump’s ‘Freedom Means Affordable Cars’ Rings Hollow As Gas Prices Surge

March 30, 2026

Monday’s Headlines Pedal Backwards

March 30, 2026

Transit Safety For the People, By the People

March 30, 2026

Friday Video: Five Bike Advocacy Mistakes You Don’t Even Know You’re Making

March 27, 2026
See all posts