Why a Broke State DOT Could Be Great for Missouri

These expensive flyovers in sprawling Missouri might not have been worth the expense to taxpayers. Maybe a broke MoDOT will help bring projects back down to earth. Image: NextSTL
Maybe a broke MoDOT will bring costs back down to earth by not building projects like these expensive flyovers. Image: NextSTL

In August, Missouri voters roundly defeated a sales tax increase supported by road building interests that would have dramatically boosted funding for the state DOT. During the run-up to the election, state leaders laid it on thick in their appeal for more road money, arguing that the fallout would be disastrous for public safety if voters didn’t approve the 0.75 percent sales tax hike.

But voters didn’t bite on the business-as-usual proposal. And now, reports Richard Bose in a brilliant post at NextSTL, the state has unveiled its Plan B: a tighter budget that is packaged in language designed to scare residents into approving another funding source for the DOT.

MoDOT's approach to highway funding is no longer sustainable. The organization hopes its scaled-back plans encourage voters to pony up more money. Image; MoDOT
MoDOT’s approach to highway funding is no longer sustainable. The agency hopes its scaled-back plans scare voters into ponying up more money. Image: MoDOT

Missouri officials call it the “325 Plan,” because the state will only have $325 million to spend annually on transportation by 2017. Among the warnings: “Supplementary roads will become a patchwork of repairs. Heavy loads on Missouri bridges will be limited, and some bridges could be closed indefinitely.” In light of the budget crunch, the state has said it will make “improvements” on only 8,000 of its 34,000 miles of roads. But the rest will still receive basic maintenance.

Bose says putting Missouri DOT on an austerity budget might be just what the doctor ordered. After all, over the last decade, the state binged on road spending, much of it backed by borrowing. And yet the state still has almost 500 bridges in poor or serious condition, and its economy is still performing worse than the nation as a whole. Perhaps giving the DOT more money to throw at highway construction isn’t going to fix anything.

Back when money was flowing freely, many of the state-supported highway expansions were little more than jobs programs, Bose says. Now it’s not clear that the state’s economy can support infrastructure at the scale that was built. Missouri DOT isn’t about to admit that’s a possibility, though:

They fail to mention that 34,000 miles of roads might be too much for our population and economy to sustain. They fail to mention the luxurious features added like these flyovers near Farmington and in Jasper County [above]. Does the incremental increase in economic activity compared to an intersection come anywhere close to paying for them? Not even close. Their purpose was to provide jobs for the industry.

Furthermore, fewer road expansions will mean less sprawl, Bose says, which will help improve the financial productivity of existing developed areas and lessen the burden on future generations:

Without state subsidy we will have to get more out of those streets than we do now. Yes, that means more buildings taller than one story, less parking, slower design speeds, living closer to each other, more walking. We will have to increase the amount of economic activity per unit of infrastructure. We’ll be safer, wealthier, and healthier for it.

Voters sent a signal when they rejected the state’s request to fund roads with a large increase in the regressive sales tax. If the state is serious about devoting more resources to transportation, writes Bose, it has to change the way the DOT does business:

MoDOT encourages us to take action and ask tough questions. Let’s ask why gas and diesel taxes are so low? Was limiting them to only go to roads and bridges in 2004 wise? Shouldn’t diesel taxes reflect the amount of damage done to roads by heavy loads? Why is fuel exempt from sales taxes? Why can’t counties and cities levy their own fuel taxes? Should we not bond again and go to pay-as-you-go? Why should urban areas subsidize low productivity projects in other areas of the state? Why does MoDOT gamble with tax dollars on low returning investments on the edges of towns and cities? Why should we approve more money when MoDOT projects have done so much damage to cities big and small?

Maybe Missourians’ refusal to support the state’s transportation funding plans will compel this old school agency to reform its ways.

  • John Norquist

    Missouri DOT, aka “The Highway Dept.”, has spent many $billions reducing the value of Missouri cities with road “improvements”. Don’t give them another dime until they learn that infrastructure investments in urban communities must add value not subtract it. What MoDot has done to St. Louis since WWII has helped make much of St. Louis look like WWII was centered there.

  • Akshai Singh

    Has been what we’ve been hearing from Transportation officials in VA as well.

  • Eric

    The unique factor in Missouri is that the state owns the majority of rural roads that would be county-owned most other states, as well as many urban arterial streets that would otherwise be city-owned. These are the roads that are most important for bike/ped access.

    As MoDOT narrows its focus to the major highways and Interstates, conditions will deteriorate for bicyclists and pedestrians on the state-owned local roads. Going forward, there will be few opportunities to add bike lanes, trails, sidewalks, etc. to these roads. While the 325 plan makes sense in the big picture, it will likely have serious long-term consequences for improving bike/ped conditions in Missouri.

    In the long run, Missouri’s road system needs to be devolved. Local roads should be transferred to the counties and cities, and the communities that want a quality transportation system can choose to fund it.

  • R Naterlin

    They need to find a contractor that can build a road that will last.? Whats destroying the roads? Why do they not last? why are there still so many dirt roads in MIssouri?. They can toss all the money they want at the road system but i would take a hard look at how roads and concrete work is done and why it does not last but cracks , crumbles, sinks and buckles.? This is 2017? we havent figured out the Road Technology yet? You cant tax the people anymore than it is. This problem should have been delt with 30 years ago not now.

  • R Naterlin

    Have to agree with you my friend. I have traveled the world an lived in some of the poorest countries that now have improved but never in my life have i seen such bad roads and parking lots. As you say some towns look like a war was fought there or that you might be in Cambodia 20 years ago/ when it was coming out of communism. This is 2017! and its America. I am really surprised that the old 60 minutes did not take the camera out to see the spectacle in disbelief?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Kansas City Residents to Missouri DOT: Enough With the Highways Already

|
Usually when we hear news from a Streetsblog Network member about the Missouri Department of Transportation, it’s because the agency is blocking ideas like a complete streets bill or a highway-to-boulevard conversion in downtown St. Louis. The advocates at BikeWalkKC report that now the agency is feeling some grassroots resistance to its cars-first approach: The […]

Graphed: While Gas Tax Erodes, Transit Fares Climb

|
This is an illuminating chart, produced by Richard Bose at Network blog NextSTL. It shows how Missouri electeds have let the gas tax steadily erode in real dollars while transit riders have been subjected to repeated fare increases. Now, Bose explains, state officials are preparing to double-down on this double standard: Metro is considering raising […]