Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Federal Funding

Congress Hits the Snooze Button on Transpo Funding Until May

2:32 PM EDT on August 1, 2014

Someone had to cave and last night, it was the Senate.

Closed for the summer. Photo: ##
Closed for the summer. Photo: ##
Image: Politic365

The upper chamber had fought as long as it could to adjust the House transportation bill so it wouldn't expire when the GOP controls both chambers of Congress. But senators were never willing to actually let the Highway Trust Fund go broke. U.S. DOT would have started cutting back on reimbursements to state DOTs as of today in the absence of an agreement.

After the House rejected the Senate’s amendment yesterday, hours before representatives were due to return to their home districts for the five-week August recess, it seemed the Senate had no choice. Then, news broke that the House was going to stick around a little longer to keep fighting about the border crisis.

Could the Senate have taken advantage of the House’s presence to toss the football back to them, on the assumption that the last team holding it will get blamed for the fumble? Maybe. Maybe the House would have been the one to cave, then. Maybe they would have sent the transportation industry into a tailspin. In a recent poll, 85 percent of transit agencies said they would implement service cuts if that happened.

At least we were spared that. But perhaps not for long. Former U.S. DOT official Beth Osborne, now at Transportation for America, noted that each extension seems to be getting harder. "The easy ways to pay for the program are gone," she said. "It’s going to get harder doing this with bubble gum and band-aids."

Who cares?

Last night on Twitter, Cap’n Transit paid me the backhanded compliment of my life by saying:

Still baffled. Why pay a smart reporter like @StreetsblogUSA to waste her time and ours on highway funding nonsense?

— Cap'n Transit (@capntransit) August 1, 2014

The Cap’n likens the trust fund apportionment to unjust servings of pie -- “Imagine that your dad makes great pie, but you’ve got a selfish older sister who hogs the pie.” You get where this is going. Do you join your piggish sister in lobbying for more pie for her greedy pie-hole (in hopes that your tiny sliver grows too), or do you demand fairer servings of the existing pie?

There is a lot to be said for the Cap’n’s point of view there.

“It’s like, ‘Are we going to shoot ourselves in the foot or are we going to shoot ourselves in the head?’” said Eno Center for Transportation President Joshua Schank, admitting that he, too, finds the current political drama “uninteresting.”

“It’s just so silly and pointless," Schank said. "The real questions we should be fighting over are how do we pay for it and how do we spend it? And we’re not fighting over those things.”

Osborne adds that it's hard to have a conversation about radically shifting resources when you’re cutting back. "Reforms come when there’s more money on the table," she said. "The pot gets bigger and we figure out how to better distribute it."

Schank also notes that transit relies heavily on federal trust fund money, especially in the most transit-dependent places. “If you didn’t have this program, then the New York City subway is going to start breaking down very fast,” he said. “So if I’m for transit, I don’t know that I would be so quick to discard the program.”

He would, however, transform it radically, relying more on discretionary grant programs paid out of the general fund, and less on formula funding out of the Highway Trust Fund, giving more flexibility to states and localities.

Reformers will keep fighting for a future with a very different balance between roads and transit. That's why these bills continue to matter, insofar as they present an opportunity to make changes to how transportation is prioritized and funded.

But the next 10 months will be much like the last five years for states, cities and transit agencies that have been trying to operate -- and sometimes even grow -- in the face of enormous uncertainty.

Art Guzzetti of the American Public Transportation Association holds out hope that “maybe there will a little magic at the end of the year,” noting that even though the extended the trust fund through May, Congress doesn’t have to wait till the last minute like they usually do. “They’re at liberty to take it up during the lame duck,” he said.

But the most likely scenario is that the volume gets muted on this conversation until May, when we get to do this whole dance again.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

NYC Debuts Public E-Bike Charging for Delivery Workers

Finally, they’re taking charge! The city’s first public e-bike charging station opened in Cooper Square on Thursday — the start of an overdue six-month pilot that is part of a “Charge Safe Ride Safe Action Plan” for delivery workers that Mayor Adams announced last year.

March 1, 2024

Friday’s Headlines Have Questions

What's an optimal rebate to get people to buy e-bikes without wasting money on those who were going to buy one anyway?

March 1, 2024

To Recruit Transit Workers, More Than Just Higher Pay Is Needed

Labor shortages continue threatening public transit systems, and a new report adds another layer to the conversation.

February 29, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Streets for Skateboards

Aaron Breetwor on skateboards for transportation and designing streets for safer skateboarding.

February 29, 2024

Agencies Need to Use Federal Funding to Buy Land for Transit Oriented Development

Transit agencies do not prioritize transit-adjacent housing development often because they lack funding to acquire land.

February 29, 2024
See all posts