Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Streetsblog.net

Attorney: Town Goes Too Far With Penalties for Parents of Helmetless Kids

In the quest for safer cycling, the village of Oak Park just outside Chicago has gone punitive. This leafy suburb recently enacted a mandatory helmet law for children under 17. Parents of tykes riding trikes and Huffys could face fines and community service if their children are caught without a styrofoam cap.

A photo of the writer's daughter, learning to bike and wear a helmet. Image: ##http://www.mybikeadvocate.com/2013/12/oak-park-wrong-to-mandate-that-children.html## Chicago Bicycle Advocate##
A photo of Kevenides' daughter, learning to bike and wear a helmet. Image: ##http://www.mybikeadvocate.com/2013/12/oak-park-wrong-to-mandate-that-children.html## Chicago Bicycle Advocate##
false

Attorney Brendan Kevenides at Chicago Bicycle Advocate says the new rule is too severe:

Few sensible people would dispute the benefits of encouraging children to ride their bikes. Bikes promote independence and good health for kids (and adults). They also happen to be really fun. Injuries sometimes occur, so kids should be taught safe riding practices and should be encouraged to wear a helmet. When kids wear bike helmets the chance of injury is very significantly reduced. According to Children's Hospital of Illinois, "Wearing a proper fitting helmet can reduce the chances of serious head injuries by 85%." It is hard to argue with statistics like that.

Yeah, children should be encouraged to bike with a helmet, but first they should be encouraged to just ride. Parents need some leeway with regard to how to accomplish that. The new Oak Park ordinance is fairly harsh. "Parents of children under 17 will be required to pay a $25 fine or perform up to four hours of community service if their child is caught three times riding a bicycle without a helmet," according to The Chicago Tribune. Many parents will feel it necessary to force their children to wear a helmet in the face of this potential punishment. Some may even receive the misleading message that if the law requires helmet use perhaps biking is just too dangerous an activity for their kids. In my opinion, helmet use for kids and adults alike should be encouraged, not mandated.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Cap'n Transit says many of New Jersey's cities are very bike and transit friendly, but traveling between them is a whole other story. Systemic Failure wonders what American rail planners have against articulated train sets. And Peninsula Transportation Alternatives reports the city of East Palo Alto is beginning a transportation demand management program to help workers find ways to commute without driving.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday’s Headlines Trust the Science

Who do you believe, 85 climate experts, or five people hand-picked by the Trump administration?

September 5, 2025

New York City Will Further Rein In Delivery Apps

A soon-to-pass bill would require safety equipment, plus a safety course.

September 5, 2025

Friday Video: How Public Transportation Fails ‘Fat’ People

Take a deep dive on the importance of size-inclusive transit, and what activists in Brussels are doing to get it.

September 5, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: Wonders of the South Bay

VTA's Sam Sargent on the past, present and future of transit in the South Bay.

September 4, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines Lobby Congress

When the Biden administration's infrastructure act expires, it will pit cities versus states and roads versus transit.

September 4, 2025

Why More Communities Are Reconsidering Speed Limits From a Pedestrian’s Perspective

Is America's driver-centered approach to setting speed limits starting to shift? An engineer argues it is, and offers a reminder about why it matters.

September 4, 2025
See all posts