Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
AASHTO

FHWA Endorses Engineering Guide for Walkable Urban Streets

A new engineering guide instructs transportation professionals on how the special needs of urban streets. Image: ##http://www.cnu.org/streets## CNU.org##

Urban streets serve a much different purpose than rural ones: They're for walking, socializing, and local commerce, not just moving vehicles. Unfortunately, American engineering guides tend not to capture these nuances.

That can lead to a lot of problems for cities. Wide roads appropriate for rural areas are dangerous and bad for local businesses in an urban setting.

But there's change on the horizon. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Engineers' "Green Book," the so-called bible of transportation engineering, has some new competition specially designed for urban places.

Last month, the Federal Highway Administration gave its stamp of approval to two new engineering guides: the National Association of City Transportation Officials' bikeway design guide, which features street treatments like protected bike lanes, and Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach, designed to help cities build streets that are walkable and safe for all users.

The urban thoroughfares guide, produced by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and the Congress for the New Urbanism, is based on the concept of "context sensitive solutions," which seeks to balance the movement of vehicles with other objectives, like promoting active transportation and fostering retail businesses. Both guides are now recommended by FHWA as companions to AASHTO's guide.

Jeffrey Tumlin, a consultant with NelsonNygaard and an adviser to the development of the urban thoroughfares guide, said the revolutionary thing about it is the engineering guidance about the important ways urban "arterials" differ from rural highways. Problems can arise when the Green Book is applied to cities because it is written by the organization of state DOTs, which are mainly concerned with highway building, not local streets.

"While AASHTO guidelines do accommodate a broad array of street designs, where they are weak is providing designers with information about the way in which local streets are very different," said Tumlin. "Engineers need more thorough guidance on the ways in which urban arterials are distinct from rural highways and ways in which to design those arterials to prioritize a wide variety of objectives."

The new ITE guide instructs engineers to "use performance measures that benefit all modes," and to consider the surrounding area -- the character of the community -- when designing streets.

The guide was developed over 10 years by ITE and CNU, with funding from FHWA and the EPA, and has been available for a few years. The city of El Paso, Texas, for example, has instructed its transportation engineers to use the guide on all city streets. FHWA's memo signals the first time it has been formally endorsed by the federal government.

Ian Lockwood, a livable transportation engineer and principal with AECOM, says AASHTO's Green Book already provides the kind of flexibility that allows engineers to do good projects that benefit urban environments. But this new guide could push a more innovative approach to livable streets.

"Efforts like this are ways to interpret the AASHTO guidelines and related guidelines to make it easier to do something a little more enlightened," he said. "This raises awareness; it gives people examples. It gives them what we call 'cover.' If engineers start to follow them, they can say it’s endorsed, bona fide."

CNU says the fact that the guide was published by a relatively conservative group -- the Institute of Transportation Engineers -- strengthens the case that great urban street designs are safe and tested.

"FHWA's statement puts the ITE Street Guide front and center on every traffic engineer's desk." says CNU Director John Norquist. "This is exactly what we hoped would happen."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Are We All Living in a ‘Carspiracy’?

How does "car-brain" shape the way we think about the world — even in relatively bike-friendly countries like the U.K.?

July 26, 2024

Friday’s Headlines Share and Share Alike

Bikeshares, and e-bikes and scooters generally, are becoming more popular. That's led to more injuries, highlighting the need for better infrastructure.

July 26, 2024

What the Heck is Going on With the California E-Bike Incentive Program?

The program's launch has been delayed for two years, and currently "there is no specific timeline" for it. Plus the administrator, Pedal Ahead, is getting dragged, but details are vague.

July 26, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Have Cities Run Out of Land?

Chris Redfearn of USC and Anthony Orlando of Cal Poly Pomona on why "pro-business" Texas housing markets are catching up to "pro-regulation" California and what it might mean for future city growth.

July 25, 2024

The Paris Plan for Olympic Traffic? Build More Bike Lanes

A push to make Paris fully bikable for the Olympics is already paying dividends long before the opening ceremonies.

July 25, 2024
See all posts