Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Barack Obama

Boehner Calls Obama’s Bluff on Infrastructure (But Who Will Call Boehner’s?)

Did you notice the big white beard and jolly red cheeks on President Obama at the State of the Union the other night? He's the new Santa Claus, giving out gifts the government can't afford to greedy little kids everywhere.

That's how House Speaker John Boehner sees the president's latest proposal for infrastructure investment -- $40 billion for maintenance, under a strict "fix it first" ethic, with no revenue stream attached to it.

“Trying to find a funding source to repair the nation’s infrastructure is still a big goal of mine," Boehner told reporters yesterday. "And the president talked about infrastructure, but he didn’t talk about how to pay for it. It’s easy to go out there and be Santa Claus and talk about all these things you want to give away, but at some point, somebody’s got to pay the bill.”

This is exactly what happened on Valentine's Day two years ago, when President Obama rolled out his six-year transportation budget proposal. The spending side of the ledger was enthusiastically filled in -- but the revenue side? Crickets.

As we said at the time, bold and innovative infrastructure proposals are great but it doesn't really help anything, in these lean times, to promise the moon and then offer nothing in the way of realistic funding.

Now, Boehner's not blameless in all this. He says he's looking for a funding source, but only if it rhymes with "soil shilling." Foil filling? Oil drilling. That's right. Otherwise, he's only too happy to cut transportation spending by a third -- and next time around, it'll be an even bigger cut than that. It's certainly disappointing that Congressional Democrats and the White House have been afraid to come out in favor of a gas tax hike, but it's not as if Boehner's been pushing for sensible revenue measures either.

Forty billion dollars for transportation maintenance is a worthy goal. It could hold at bay the calls for highway expansion and help the country get more out of the infrastructure we have, while saving ourselves bigger expenditures on replacement when poorly maintained infrastructure finally needs to go. It could even have big benefits for bicycling.

If we can't find the money to pay for this, what will we find the money for? U.S. DOT's plan for 3,000 new miles of highway?

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Black Transportation Justice: A Closer Look at Intersectional Labor Movements

Throughout the 20th century, Black civil rights leaders used transportation as a means to challenge white supremacy, aiding movements for organized labor and feminism along the way.

June 24, 2025

Illinois Transit Overhaul Could Be a Game-Changer For the Rest of America, Too

A major development in Illinois could ripple far beyond the Midwest – reshaping how America thinks about high-speed and intercity rail.

June 24, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Won’t Reconcile

Republicans who want to repeal the Biden Administration's limits on tailpipe emissions had their hopes dashed by the Senate parliamentarian.

June 24, 2025

Which American Cities Are Becoming Bike-Friendly the Fastest?

America has a new most bike-friendly city — but fast-improving communities across the country are hot on its heels.

June 24, 2025

Popular Cycling Roads and Trails Threatened by Trump’s Public Lands Sell-off

Oregon advocates are concerned about how Trump's controversial policy would impact biking in the state — and beyond.

June 24, 2025

Anti-Tesla Bills Are On the Rise Across America — But So Are Double-Agent Lobbyists

Do local communities' attempts to rein in America's most notorious automaker stand a chance if the lobbyists they hire are also representing Tesla?

June 23, 2025
See all posts