Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Transit

Public Interest Group Makes Progress in Case Against Transit Patent Troll

11:47 AM EDT on September 19, 2012

Martin Kelly Jones makes his living suing transit agencies and other entities for violating his patents on real-time tracking technology. His lawsuits have been an expensive nuisance for the companies and agencies he sues, usually settling for $50,000 to $75,000. But a movement to stop him is gaining traction.

Real-time transit tracking -- on your phone or computer or in stations -- makes transit more efficient for riders. Why is Martin Kelly Jones punishing transit agencies for using it? Photo: ##http://support.google.com/transitpartners/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=2529187##Google##

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, in its quest to invalidate patents that hinder innovation, has been looking for what's called "prior art." Prior art is evidence that an idea existed and was in circulation before someone else patented it. EFF thinks they've found it.

Last week, EFF and attorneys at Berkeley Law School filed a request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, urging the office to re-examine the legitimacy of Jones' patent on real-time tracking technology.

"Even if you could patent something that broad and vague – and we think you can't – you certainly can't patent something that was invented by other people years before," said EFF Staff Attorney Julie Samuels.

EFF says they've got their "prior art":

ArrivalStar [one of Jones' offshore companies] claims its patents are based on an invention from 1999 and argues that many widely used transit-tracking systems – as well as some package-tracking services used by delivery and shipping companies – are infringing. But in the reexamination request filed today, EFF and the Samuelson Clinic show that as far back as 1992, public technical reports described a "Smart Bus system" that used the same methods as those included in the ArrivalStar patent.

EFF found a U.S. DOT technical report from 1992 that describes just the kind of vehicle tracking in the patent, according to details provided by David Alpert at Greater Greater Washington. "News articles talk about the Nextbus company's product, which also does this, from 1996. Yet the patent office granted Patent #7,030,781 in 1999 2006, but with a 'priority date,' the date before which prior art is relevant, of 1999 or 1993."

Patent trolls -- people who don't make or sell anything but hold on to patents so they can sue anyone that does -- put a chill on innovation. In this case, they disincentivize transit agencies from providing information that makes their service far more appealing and easy to use. We all pay the price of low transit ridership in the form of traffic congestion, safety hazards, air pollution, and decreased mobility. EFF, Berkeley, and all the other advocates and attorneys working to stop patent trolling are doing us all a favor.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Car Noise Pollution is Worse in Redlined Neighborhoods — And Not Just for Humans

Transportation noise pollution can wreak havoc on wildlife populations, too — and that can have a devastating effect on their human neighbors.

December 6, 2023

Oakland Calif. Mayor Makes New Promise About Safety

Mayor Thao Tweets "It's time to reach a critical juncture where tragedies don’t catalyze improvements." But when and how will we know if the city has really reached that point and is serious about safety for all road users?

December 5, 2023

Wednesday’s Headlines Envy Europe

Could the EU keep U.S. megacars off their streets?

December 5, 2023

Tuesday’s Headlines Are Getting Warmer

EVs and renewables are not going to be enough to stave off a climate catastrophe, scientists are warning officials at an international conference.

December 5, 2023
See all posts