Skip to content

The Scandalously High Cost of Shortchanging Transit

You will remember that Wisconsin was the state that, according to Gov. Scott Walker, couldn't afford to operate an inter-city rail system, even with an $800 million federal start-up grant.

You will remember that Wisconsin was the state that, according to Gov. Scott Walker, couldn’t afford to operate an inter-city rail system, even with an $800 million federal start-up grant.

But it turns out that having a transportation system based entirely on automobile travel isn’t exactly cheap. Now, instead of reaping savings, Wisconsin is drowning in highway bills.

According to James Rowen at Network blog The Political Environment, car congestion along the corridor that would have been served by the federal rail grant is prompting a $2 billion expansion:

An ideologically-motivated Republican state legislature killed planning for a commuter rail line to connect Milwaukee, Racine and Kenosha, thus guaranteeing congestion on the I-94 corridor south to the Illinois line that is under $1.9 billion worth of reconstruction and widening for several more years.

Meanwhile, Southeast Wisconsin barely averted disaster for its transit system recently thanks to a one-time federal stopgap of a few million dollars.

On the other hand, highway spending is moving ahead full bore, with a menu that includes a $1.7 billion interchange rebuild:

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

More from Streetsblog USA

The Races Transportation Reformers Are Watching This Midterms

November 3, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines Vote Early and Vote Often

November 3, 2026

Would Ending Seasonal Clock Changes Make Streets Safer for People Outside Cars?

November 2, 2026

Opinion: Robotaxis Need Clear Rules — Even in ‘Exceptional’ Situations

November 2, 2026

Monday’s Headlines Live Happily Ever After

November 2, 2026
See all posts