Federal Government, Despite Progress, Still Acting as an Agent of Sprawl
It's been encouraging lately to see the federal government making an effort to remedy its traditionally sprawl-promoting ways, with programs like the Partnership for Sustainable Communities. But sometimes it seems like the feds could benefit from some of their own guidance on sustainable development.
For example, outside Fresno -- and we mean way outside Frenso -- federal, state and local tax dollars are helping build a veterans' home. The site chosen is not only undeveloped greenfield land, but land that is not in any way connected to urban development -- the dreaded leapfrog move.
This type of development is counterproductive enough when it's pursued by the private sector, and reducing the public costs associated with this practice is one of the goals of the Sustainable Communities program. So it's frustrating to see federal tax dollars being used to promote exactly what the federal government is simultaneously spending tax dollars to discourage.
James Sinclair at Stop and Move responds:
Now, like all residents, veterans want access to the community. Grocery stores, restaurants, shops, cafes etc. But on top of that, they also need access to medical services. A location that should provide the vets the care they need, with easy access from visitors and the ability to be involved in the community.
Of course, the picture above tells a different story ...
See a store? See a hospital? See any form of development...? See a sidewalk or bike lane or park or....anything?
This new home is in the middle of nowhere. The real middle of nowhere. Out of curiosity, where is the VA Hospital? Seven miles away.
There's a reason prisons are generally built in the far-off outskirts. Why are we giving these veterans the same treatment?
Elsewhere on the Network today: Arlington's Car-Free Diet Blog shares the news of a Spanish town that is offering a lifetime of free transit service for residents who agree to trade in their cars. Rhode Island Bicycle Coalition reports the state is considering ending its bike and pedestrian programs, outside of Safe Routes to School. And Biking in LA says AAA has come out against California's three-foot passing bill.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Friday’s Headlines Don’t Feel the Need for Speed
Tell me again, which constitutional amendment is it that gives people the right to drive as fast as they want?
Komanoff: IMHO, TMRB is A-OK
Here’s what’s to like about the Traffic Mobility Review Board's central business district toll recommendations. It's a lot!
Talking Headways Podcast: The Sexy World of Bus Speeds
When you start to add up the numbers, you can see why agency leaders would be interesting in finding ways to reduce those costs.
Thursday’s Headlines See Daylight
Daylighting, or removing parking near intersections, is an often overlooked way to improve pedestrian safety.
Why So Many U.S. Drivers Think Speeding Is Perfectly Safe
Do Americans hit lethal speeds because they're in a rush, or because they have no idea that they're increasing their chances of death with every tick of the odometer?
