Skip to content

Republican Response to USDOT’s High-Speed Rail Grantees

In my last story about the allocation of high-speed rail funds, I said House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica (R-FL) must be pleased to finally see the Northeast Corridor get its due. In a statement hot off the GOP's presses, Mica didn't sound exactly pleased.

In my last story about the allocation of high-speed rail funds, I said House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica (R-FL) must be pleased to finally see the Northeast Corridor get its due. In a statement hot off the GOP’s presses, Mica didn’t sound exactly pleased.

Once again, the Administration has scattered funding to numerous slower-speed rail projects, and allowed Amtrak to hijack 21 of the 22 grants. [There he notes that Amtrak was the recipient of 76 of the 78 initial passenger rail grants awarded under the stimulus.] Only two months ago, the Administration finally designated the Northeast Corridor as a high-speed rail corridor, and today provided funding for projects in this region. However, with Amtrak’s plan to spend $117 billion over the next 30 years, the Administration continues to take a piecemeal approach to improving the NEC.

And Mica just can’t mention Amtrak without using his favorite epithet for it: “Amtrak – our nation’s Soviet-style passenger rail service – is incapable of carrying out a project of this scope and significance,” he said.

Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA), who heads the Railroads Subcommittee, said he questions the realism of the president’s high-speed rail policy, although he is gratified to see the inclusion of the NEC.

“We will not achieve real high-speed rail in America by dumping 21 of 22 grants into the black hole that is Amtrak,” he said, using his own personal favorite insult for the nation’s rail service.

“We need to focus government funds on the lines that make most sense, and create incentives to bring the private sector to design, build, maintain and manage true high-speed rail lines,” he said. “I have yet to see this mindset take hold in the White House and until it does, true high-speed rail will remain on the drawing board.”

Indeed, there are some legitimate questions about the most effective way to distribute high-speed rail money and some concerns that the improved service won’t be worth the pricetag. But still, these guys are hard to please. It appears nothing short of shooting Amtrak in the head and dumping it in the ocean will make them happy.

Photo of Tanya Snyder
Tanya became Streetsblog's Capitol Hill editor in September 2010 after covering Congress for Pacifica Radio’s Washington bureau and for public radio stations around the country. She lives car-free in a transit-oriented and bike-friendly neighborhood of Washington, DC.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog USA

Tuesday’s Headlines Curb Their Enthusiasm

April 21, 2026

‘Best Bikeshare in America’: An Unexpected Community Launches Free, All-Electric Micromobility For Residents

April 21, 2026

‘A Solution, But To What Problem?’ Experts Say AVs Are The Elephant In The Room, But There’s Still Time To Figure Out Their Role

April 20, 2026

When Traffic Violence Hits The Same Family Twice — Years Apart, On Exactly the Same Street

April 20, 2026

Monday’s Headlines Should Wean Themselves Off Fossil Fuels

April 20, 2026
See all posts