Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Amtrak

Republican Response to USDOT’s High-Speed Rail Grantees

In my last story about the allocation of high-speed rail funds, I said House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica (R-FL) must be pleased to finally see the Northeast Corridor get its due. In a statement hot off the GOP's presses, Mica didn't sound exactly pleased.

Rep. Bill Shuster. Photo: ##http://www.buses.org/insider/printemail/5##American Bus Association##

Once again, the Administration has scattered funding to numerous slower-speed rail projects, and allowed Amtrak to hijack 21 of the 22 grants. [There he notes that Amtrak was the recipient of 76 of the 78 initial passenger rail grants awarded under the stimulus.] Only two months ago, the Administration finally designated the Northeast Corridor as a high-speed rail corridor, and today provided funding for projects in this region. However, with Amtrak’s plan to spend $117 billion over the next 30 years, the Administration continues to take a piecemeal approach to improving the NEC.

And Mica just can't mention Amtrak without using his favorite epithet for it: "Amtrak – our nation’s Soviet-style passenger rail service – is incapable of carrying out a project of this scope and significance," he said.

Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA), who heads the Railroads Subcommittee, said he questions the realism of the president’s high-speed rail policy, although he is gratified to see the inclusion of the NEC.

“We will not achieve real high-speed rail in America by dumping 21 of 22 grants into the black hole that is Amtrak," he said, using his own personal favorite insult for the nation's rail service.

“We need to focus government funds on the lines that make most sense, and create incentives to bring the private sector to design, build, maintain and manage true high-speed rail lines," he said. "I have yet to see this mindset take hold in the White House and until it does, true high-speed rail will remain on the drawing board.”

Indeed, there are some legitimate questions about the most effective way to distribute high-speed rail money and some concerns that the improved service won't be worth the pricetag. But still, these guys are hard to please. It appears nothing short of shooting Amtrak in the head and dumping it in the ocean will make them happy.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Thursday’s Headlines Walk Hard

Where you live probably has a lot to do with how much you walk.

February 19, 2026

When The Suburbs Want To Opt Out of Funding Regional Transit

A messy transit funding fight in Dallas may have reached a pause — but some advocates fear the détente won't hold.

February 19, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines Have Consequences

The Trump administration's actions on climate change have consequences for future generations. Industries might not like what they get in return.

February 18, 2026

Trump’s Canada Bridge Tantrum Could Be Bad News For An International Bike Trail

A multi-use trail along the Gordie Howe Bridge would be a key component of an epic cross-continental trail route — if Trump doesn't prevent the entire structure from opening.

February 17, 2026

Disturbing Utah ‘Bikelash’ Bill Takes Aim at Salt Lake City Traffic Calming

Utah state legislators aren't traffic engineers — so why are they writing laws that would force the review of specific bike lanes already on the roads in their capitol, and preemptively stop Salt Lake from building more?

February 17, 2026

The Explainer: How Big Tech Push For Cheap Car Insurance Hurts Victims

In New York State, Gov. Kathy Hochul is distorting the notion of "affordability" to do Big Tech's bidding.

February 17, 2026
See all posts