Well That Was Quick: Obama Disavows Mileage Fee Proposal

The Hill is reporting that the Obama administration has already sworn off a move toward a vehicle-miles-traveled fee. We just reported that an undated draft of the administration transportation proposal included the creation of an office to study the feasibility of implementing such a system to replace the traditional fuel tax.

The Hill’s Keith Laing writes:

The proposal was included in a draft of the administration’s Transportation Opportunities Act, but a White House spokesman said it “was not an administration proposal.”

“This is not a bill supported by the administration,” White House spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki said. “This was an early working draft proposal that was never formally circulated within the administration, does not take into account the advice of the president’s senior advisers, economic team or Cabinet officials, and does not represent the views of the president.”

This calls into question not just the VMT fee but all the proposals in the draft bill being circulated. If the White House is walking away from one piece of it, who knows what other elements in the draft have already been removed?

8 thoughts on Well That Was Quick: Obama Disavows Mileage Fee Proposal

  1. It’s just a dumb idea.

    It’s meant as an alternative to the extremely unpopular (but necessary) idea of raising the gas tax. Except it’s a worse policy environmentally, and is bound to make the gas tax popular in comparison. No one wants the government snooping on how many miles they drive.

    Raise the frickin’ gas tax, and index it to inflation so we don’t get in this mess again.

  2. It’s a dumb idea that does not improve on the status quo, with a horrible obstacle in the way. that never dies.

  3. big brother watching every move you do is not good. however, raising the frickin’ gas tax in a frail economy is also not good either.

  4. Carma: Why is an income tax better than a gas tax, in a frail economy or in any other?

  5. Do you know what forward thinking is?

    Cars wont use gas forever. In fact, there are 10,000 on the streets right now that use none at all.

    Who pays for the maintenence?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Why (Much of) Obama’s Transpo Plan Can Survive the GOP Knife

Yesterday, anti-rail curmudgeon Ken Orski of Innovation Briefs quoted me in his latest diatribe against the administration’s transportation proposal, in which he explains why the Obama plan is unrealistic. Indeed, I think it’s safe to say the dollar amount of the administration’s bill is a non-starter in today’s political and economic climate, given that it’s […]

White House Staying Quiet For Now on Transit’s Role in Climate Bill

Delivering his climate-change message to Congress yesterday, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood warned that fuel-efficiency advances secured by the Obama administration would not be enough to reduce emissions from transportation — not without encouraging Americans to drive less. Transportation Secretary LaHood said today he’ll weigh in later on climate-change money for transit. (Photo: HillBuzz) But when […]

House Transportation Committee Rejects Obama’s 2012 Budget Request

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is having its say about the president’s ambitious – and unpaid-for – budget request for transportation. “The [president’s] proposal assumes a ‘placeholder revenue increase’ of $435 billion over a 10-year period but does not identify how to pay for the revenue increase,” says the committee’s “Views and Estimates” document, […]

Obama Takes a Stand, Threatens to Veto House Transpo Bill

The White House issued a statement yesterday that spelled out President Obama’s opposition to the House transportation bill, also known as H.R. 7. The administration’s statement of policy, which coincided with the House Rules Committee hearing on H.R. 7, takes a stand in defense of transit, safety, and the environment: H.R. 7 does not reflect […]