- Senate Extends Transit Benefit, Ball Now In House's Court (Baltimore Sun)
- First Nationwide Count of Parking Spaces Tallies More Than 500 Million (Knoxville News Sentinel)
- PA Gov. Rendell Invests $45M in Pittsburgh Transit Rather Than Cut Service (Post Gazette)
- Will Anti-Rail Republicans in Florida Block Reallocated Midwestern Rail Money? (ABC)
- Is High Speed Rail the Wave of the Future or a Waste of Stimulus Money? (National Journal)
- Backlash Continues Against Wisc. Gov-Elect Walker's Anti-Rail Platform (Journal Sentinel)
- Gooooooooooal: High Speed Rail for Qatar World Cup (Railway Gazette)
- A Bikeshare's-Eye View of Winter: Where Do the Bikes Go? (TheCityFix)
- Which Came First, the Bike or the Bike Lane? A Video History of Dutch Cyclepaths (Treehugger)
- Electric Vehicles Headed to a Showroom Near You (Alt Transport)
Today's Headlines
Today’s Headlines
By Tanya Snyder
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Talking Headways Podcast: Getting California High Speed Rail Done
It took a while, but California is figuring out the best, most-cost-effective way to do fast trains.
October 30, 2025
Spooky Stuff: On Halloween, Some States Will Have Deadlier Roads Than Others
Find out how yours ranks — and what policymakers can do to make streets less scary.
October 30, 2025
Who Are Thursday’s Headlines For?
Non-drivers still perceive streets as being for cars even when they have bike lanes. And that's because, in many cases, they are.
October 30, 2025
An Olympian Task: Replicating Paris’s Bike Boom in Los Angeles
The Olympics can help transform the streets of Los Angeles — if they look to the example of Paris.
October 29, 2025
Wednesday’s Headlines Are a Clear and Present Danger
Rescinding the "endangerment finding" could not only exacerbate climate change, it could also throw entire industries into chaos.
October 29, 2025
What’s More Regressive: Modest Driving Surcharges to Help Fund Transit, or Forced Car Ownership?
Do Illinois state senators and reps really want to make the financial burden on their constituents less "regressive"? If so they can start by ensuring that as many people as possible can live their lives without spending $12,000 annually just to leave their homes.
