Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
High-speed rail

New Evidence Refutes Rail Opponents’ Claims in Wisconsin

Republican Governor-Elect Scott Walker’s decision to kill the Milwaukee-to-Madison high speed rail line is based on bad data and old numbers, according to a story in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. Walker said in his campaign that Wisconsin can’t afford to pay $7.5 million a year to operate the rail line so he’s promised to kill the project, despite the fact that federal money would cover the $810 million construction costs.

The rail segment in question would connect Chicago to Minneapolis. ##http://dailyreporter.com/blog/2009/11/19/connections-2030-rail-routes-spur-competition-between-la-crosse-eau-claire/##Daily Reporter##
The rail segment in question would connect Chicago to Minneapolis. ##http://dailyreporter.com/blog/2009/11/19/connections-2030-rail-routes-spur-competition-between-la-crosse-eau-claire/##Daily Reporter##

But $7.5 million may be an enormous overestimate of the state’s costs. That number assumes that fares and concessions will bring in only $9 million a year. According to the Journal-Sentinel, the relocation of the Madison station from the airport to downtown has raised ridership estimates by nearly a third. The resulting boost in revenue world cut the state obligation to $4.7 million. (An extra jolt of cash would also come from bistro cars -- instead of snack-cart concessions -- which have been added to the plans since the initial estimate was made.)

On top of all that, the new rail line would operate with newer, more fuel-efficient cars, reducing fuel costs.

The fact that the plans call for state-owned trains, instead of Amtrak rentals, is a double-edged sword. The Journal-Sentinel says “running state-owned trains would insulate Wisconsin from expected increases in Amtrak rental charges,” but “on the other hand, the state would be responsible for maintaining the trains, and the costs of a maintenance contract with [train car manufacturer] Talgo could eat up the savings from ending the rental charges.”

Most significantly, though, federal subsidies could cover 90 percent of the state’s operating costs of this part of the line, as they do on the Milwaukee-to-Chicago segment. There’s been speculation around this for months, and the Journal-Sentinel clears it up:

That's not extra aid for the train, the [Fiscal Bureau report to state Rep. Jon Richards] says. It's a piece of federal aid that already goes to the state.

In some past years, the state covered Hiawatha operating costs with money designated to reduce southeastern Wisconsin traffic congestion and air pollution, said Fred Ammerman, a supervisor in the bureau. In recent years, however, the state has been using part of its highway aid, with federal permission, Ammerman said.

That federal money usually has covered 80 percent of costs, rising to 90 percent in years when the train helps travelers avoid freeway construction zones, the report says.

Will this new information turn Scott Walker into a high speed rail advocate? Not likely. But it could strengthen the position of those still fighting to keep the rail project alive.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday’s Headlines Turn Back the Clock

The Trump administration is undoing decades of progress on transportation emissions and safety — progress that many would argue was too modest to begin with.

March 14, 2025

Friday Video: Welcome to the War on ‘Woke’ Transportation

Overwhelmed by weeks of federal attacks on green and equitable transportation? Catch up with this explainer and plug in to the fight.

March 14, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: The Annual Yonah Freemark Show, Part II

Yonah Freemark of the Urban Institute is back again for Part II of his annual "Talking Headways" discussion.

March 13, 2025

Commentary: Nitpicks Aside, Ezra Klein is Spot-On About the Importance of High-Speed Rail

A few additional reflections and critiques specific to California's beleaguered high-speed rail project.

March 13, 2025

What if the ‘Tesla Takedown’ Is Only the Beginning?

Tesla's cars have become symbols of Elon Musk's controversial role in U.S. politics — but they're also instruments of a violent system that long predates his time in the White House.

March 13, 2025
See all posts