Debunking the Myth of Motorist Entitlement to Monopolize the Road
There's an old line among opponents of cycling and pedestrian
infrastructure. It says road construction funds shouldn't be used to
build bike lanes and sidewalks because cyclists and pedestrians don't
contribute to the gasoline taxes that fund road construction.
A bicyclist may be able to duck past high gas prices, but everyone pays for roads. Image: The Daily GreenJosh Cohen at Network blog Publicola
is refuting that argument by examining the transportation budget in
Seattle, where local gas taxes play only a small role in the overall
picture.
The Seattle Department of Transportation’s 2009 annual reportbreaks down the agency’s $340.8 million budget by funding source. Thegas tax accounts for $13.4 million, or 4 percent of that total. The full budget breakdown (in millions):
Grants & Other: $96.9 (29 percent)Debt: $77.4 (23 percent)Bridging the Gap (a property-tax levy passed by voters in 2007): $60.9 (18 percent)General Fund: $42.3 (12 percent)Reimbursables: $42 (12 percent)Gas Tax: $13.4 (4 percent)Cumulative Reserve Fund: $7.6 (2 percent)
The
majority of those funds are paid for by taxes and fees levied on the
general public, whether or not they own a car. It's a far cry from a
system where drivers are carrying the full costs of roads.
Elsewhere on the Network, Bike Portland admires Boulder, Colorado's "Driven to Drive Less" program, encouraging the public to go carless one day per week; Seattle Transit Blog
looks at the success of Tacoma, Washington's "Not on Our Bus" campaign,
which seeks to make public transportation more pleasant by cracking
down on unlawful or disruptive conduct on buses; and Car Free Baltimore explains why rush hour parking restrictions are bad for pedestrians.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Talking Headways Podcast: Money is a Lot of Different Things
It's Part II of our discussion with Jim Kumon!
If Thursday’s Headlines Build It, They Will Come
Why can the U.S. quickly rebuild a bridge for cars, but not do the same for transit? It comes down to political will and a reliance on consultants.
Wider Highways Don’t Solve Congestion. So Why Are We Still Knocking Down Homes for Them?
Highway expansion projects certainly qualify as projects for public use. But do they deliver a public benefit that justifies taking private property?
Kiss Wednesday’s Headlines on the Bus
Bus-only lanes result in faster service that saves transit agencies money and helps riders get to work faster.
Freeway Drivers Keep Slamming into Bridge Railing in L.A.’s Griffith Park
Drivers keep smashing the Riverside Drive Bridge railing - plus a few other Griffith Park bike/walk updates.
