Chicago Commuter Rail Spends Big on Trucking
Chicago's commuter rail agency will be raising this bridge to help trucks pass underneath, relying exclusively on transit funding. Photo: The UrbanophileTransit funding these days is, needless to say, scarce. Across the country, transit agencies are slashing services to cope with the gaping fiscal holes left by the recession. More than ever, every dollar counts.
It's in that context that a scoop by The Urbanophile's Aaron Renn is so jarring. In his hometown of Chicago, the commuter rail agency is embarking on a major new capital project, with a pricetag in the hundreds of millions, intended to help truckers, not transit riders. How is that siphoning of transit dollars to road users being achieved? Writes Renn:
The project in question is on the Union Pacific North Line. Metra is undertaking a project to replace 22 bridges and rebuild the Ravenswood station at a cost of $185 million and a timeline of eight years (?!). The bridges are 100 years old and there’s no question they need replacement. However, as part of this project, Metra is using transit dollars to raise the grade of the railroad to increase vertical clearance on the streets below it, and permanently destroying fully one third of the transit right of way in the process.
Further elevating the bridges wouldn't improve commuter rail service. The purpose is to allow taller trucks to pass under the bridges more easily. Renn continues:
I don’t philosophically object to raising the grade, but doing so dramatically increases the cost and complexity of the project. Metra is paying for that exclusively out of transit capital funds. One hundred percent of the value of raising the rail grade is for trucks. It has nothing at all to do with transit. Yet trucking and road funds aren’t even chipping in one cent.
I’m all in favor of an integrated transportation system without all these funding stovepipes but this is ridiculous.
And to top it all off, Metra will be eliminating a currently unused third track along the line, foreclosing the possibility of eventually using that track to expand capacity along the route. For Chicagoland readers understandably angry, Renn offers a "call to action" in his post -- check out the whole thing.
More from around the network: Jarrett Walker at Human Transit asks whether San Francisco's groundbreaking performance parking initiative might be too timid. I Bike T.O. calls out Toronto's mayoral candidates for their anti-bike stances. And Bike Baltimore files a dispatch from a bike-friendly beach town.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter
More from Streetsblog USA
Talking Headways Podcast: Beyond Greenways
This week we’re joined by Bob Searns to talk about his new book and grand ideas for walking trails that circle whole regions and more local routes that make up a new mode of green infrastructure in cities.
Thursday’s Headlines Are Inside Out
Cars and trucks are getting safer for drivers and passengers, but people outside the vehicles are increasingly in danger.
New Federal Committee Will Push for Transportation Equity By Helping DOT Reckon With Its Past
“No one alive today is necessarily responsible for the origins of the [transportation] inequities that we inherited. But everybody who was alive today and in a position of responsibility, is accountable for what we do about it. That's why we're here.”
Report: America’s Historic Bike Boom is Flatlining
"This growth won't continue forever without being facilitated by more infrastructure investment, [and particularly] safety infrastructure."
SF Advocates Explore How Enhancing Disability Access on Transit Helps for Everyone
BART was the first accessible transit system in the country. Advocates want Bay Area transit agencies to do better at keeping buses and trains accessible for all.
