Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In

Tacoma resident Evan Siroky got a rude reminder of what's in Washington State DOT's project pipeline yesterday, reading in the local paper that officials are looking to revive plans to extend state route 167 as a limited access highway. The new highway segment would reach the Port of Tacoma, and Siroky writes on member blog Tacoma Tomorrow that it's being sold, in part, as a boon for freight movement, though most of its impact will be to induce more driving and sprawl.

To say that this project has been "revived" isn't quite the right way to put it, though. The idea never really died, despite a $2 billion pricetag that can only be partially offset by tolling the new roadway. It has sat in the pipeline as the state DOT has gone about amassing property along the right-of-way. The fact that the highway extension seems to be gaining momentum now, at a time when local transit agencies may be forced to cut service to the bone, speaks to a flaw in the outlook of many state DOTs: When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Siroky writes:

SR167.jpgWashington State DOT proposes to build this interchange linking an extension of SR167 to I-5.

Our very own Port of Tacoma is probably one of the biggest boosters for
this highway project. They see the project as a way to increase freight
accessibility to and from the Port with all the industrial development
along SR 167. Sure it would help decrease travel times maybe 5
minutes, but still, this project would be almost exclusively for
personal vehicle travel.

Overall, it's just saddening to me that
our state continues with these new highway projects. Do we really want to keep building these highway
monstrosities while leaving transit systems out to die?
Maybe most of the people in our state do want more highways. WSDOT is
after all governed by state law requiring all gas taxes to be spent on only highways and the public has voted numerous times to increase our state gas tax. Want more highways? Do nothing!

Personally,
I think we have enough highways and should be spending our money on
sexier projects like extending Tacoma Link, making Pierce Transit
better and improving Amtrak Cascades... These highway
projects will only continue to promote what today are unsustainable
automobiles and promote development of land in suburbia.

Elsewhere around the Network: Smart Growth America applauds the passage of a "Sustainable Communities Task Force" bill in North Carolina. Greater Greater Washington and the Bike-Sharing Blog map where 100 new bike-share stations will be located in the nation's capital. And M-Bike tracks the progress of a complete streets bill in the Michigan legislature.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Pennsylvania Shifted Cash From Highways to Transit – But Other States Could Go Even Further

"If your governor says they don't have money for transit, they are lying," said one advocate.

November 27, 2024

Wednesday’s Headlines Are Ready to Gobble a Turkey

Despite the challenges of a second Trump administration, we remain thankful that at least most voters continue to support transit locally.

November 27, 2024

How America’s ‘Soft Power’ is Shaping Mobility Around the World — And How Cities Like Tirana Are Resisting it

"The biggest infrastructure we had to fight to fix was the 10 centimeters between our ears — the mentality, the status symbol that the car brought. "

November 26, 2024

Tuesday’s Headlines Need to Get the Price Right

Democrats who want to prove policies like congestion pricing work for cities, come on down!

November 26, 2024

Commentary: Will San Francisco Succeed at Daylighting?

And is the city setting itself up for failure?

November 26, 2024
See all posts