Senate Climate Bill to Feature Transport Carbon Cap — But No Trading

Sens. John Kerry (D-MA) and Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) are set to roll out their long-awaited, somewhat delayed climate change bill tomorrow without onetime co-sponsor Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

The legislation no longer includes its originally conceived "linked fee" on motor fuels — which was quickly branded as a gas tax increase, alarming Graham and the White House while catching many members of the transport industry off-guard. But how does the Senate climate bill address the 30 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions that come from transportation?

The Washington Post’s Juliet Eilperin has an early look, reporting that the transportation section makes room for a "cap" on emissions but eliminates the "trade" aspect of the House-passed climate bill:

The transportation sector will not have any allowance trading, sources
said. Instead, companies will have to buy quarterly carbon allowances
that would be based on the average price in the previous quarter; the
fee would be tacked on at a stage known in the industry as "the rack,"
which is after the fuel has left the refinery but before it reaches gas
stations.

The bill would put electric utilities first in line for a sector-specific emissions cap, with other fossil fuel-using industries to follow, according to a report in National Journal that also includes a link to a leaked four-page summary of the measure. That summary suggests that the transportation industry may be pleased with the measure, referencing annual funding of "over $7 billion" for infrastructure.

For more details on how the legislation would affect U.S. infrastructure, check this space tomorrow …

(ed. note. This post was updated to add a link to the bill summary.)

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Could a New Kind of Fuel Tax Help Break the Senate Climate Deadlock?

|
Even before the Senate environment panel pushed through a GOP protest to approve its climate change bill, Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), and John Kerry (D-MA) were working behind the scenes on a so-called "tripartisan" plan that can win enough votes in Congress’ upper chamber to make nationwide emissions cuts a reality. (from […]

Would the New Senate Fuel Tax Deal a Death Blow to the Transport Bill?

|
Eight Democrats yesterday joined nearly the entire transportation universe, from road-builders to transit advocates, to warn the three Senate authors of a new climate bill against raising gas taxes without using the money for infrastructure. Their message, translated from the often impenetrable language of Washington: Imposing new fuel fees that are not routed to transport […]

White House Staying Quiet For Now on Transit’s Role in Climate Bill

|
Delivering his climate-change message to Congress yesterday, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood warned that fuel-efficiency advances secured by the Obama administration would not be enough to reduce emissions from transportation — not without encouraging Americans to drive less. Transportation Secretary LaHood said today he’ll weigh in later on climate-change money for transit. (Photo: HillBuzz) But when […]

Should a Climate Bill Even Try to Fight Sprawl?

|
The potential for a cap-and-trade climate bill to set aside significant amounts of money for reforming local land use and transportation planning is often touted by Democrats, environmental groups, and this particular Streetsblogger. Should the approach California used in SB 375 (being signed into law above) be applied to a congressional cap-and-trade climate bill? (Photo: […]