Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
Economics

U.S. DOT Proposes Giving Minority-Owned Firms Greater Shot at Contracts

Women- and minority-owned companies would have an easier time winning federal transportation contracts under a new rule released by the Obama administration today, which comes in the wake of complaints from social-equity advocates that such firms had received just 2 percent of infrastructure contracts awarded under last year's economic stimulus law.

PRFCN012.jpg(Photo: CA DOT)

The new rule would increase to $1.3 million the maximum owner's net worth required to classify a company as a "disadvantaged business enterprises" (DBE), qualifying it for federal assistance in winning contracts on the state and local level. Under the existing program, owners of DBEs were required to earn $750,000 or less per year, an income level that was last adjusted 20 years ago.

State DOTs also would face stronger monitoring requirements to ensure their DBE hiring targets are met, according to a release from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood's office.

The new rule asks states to monitor transport contractors to ensure their promises to use DBE subcontractors are kept, and states that fail to meet DBE hiring goals would have to submit a remedy to Washington that would increase deals with women- and minority-owned firms.

Finally, the rule would eliminate the need for businesses to obtain DBE status in multiple states, requiring one state DOT to accept another's DBE certification "unless it found good reason not to," the U.S. DOT stated.

LaHood launched a $20 million bonding program last year, as well as a task force to examine strategies for increasing women- and minority-owned contractors' presence in the transport work force. But a February report that DBEs had won less than $1 billion in business from the stimulus law's $48 billion infrastructure pot fueled more contention over access.

The new rule is now in a preliminary format, with public comments accepted by the U.S. DOT until July.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Why Some Congresspeople Want to Go Big on Greenways

A new bill would multiply federal funding for walking and biking paths — even as some powerful congresspeople threaten to take away what we've already got.

March 18, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines Would Walk if We Could

It would be nice if the Trump administration would let us.

March 18, 2026

Opinion: The Federal Railroad Administration’s Proposed Amtrak Restructuring is Worth Considering

The federal push to overhaul Amtrak operations is promising, but it must be done with care

March 18, 2026

Why Transit Advocates Aren’t 100% Behind This Senator’s Bold Bill To Slash Highway Funding

A new Republican bill could bring rampant highway overspending to a halt and slash emissions by one-fifth. But don't get too excited because it would hurt transit, too.

March 17, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines Are Underwater

More and more people can't afford their car payments or associated costs — which wouldn't be as big of a problem if they had a choice other than driving.

March 17, 2026

Opinion: The Hidden Costs of Free Transportation

How charging for infrastructure creates better mobility options for everyone.

March 17, 2026
See all posts