Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
National Infrastructure Bank

White House Tells Senate: Grants No Substitute For Infrastructure Bank

The White House has reiterated its commitment to a national infrastructure bank (NIB), urging the Senate to reconsider a 2010 transportation spending bill that would "substitute in its place" $1.1 billion in grants.

2003992830.jpgPatty Murray (D-WA) heads the Senate panel in charge of U.S. DOT spending. (Photo: Seattle Times)

In a statement of policy on the Senate's transport spending bill, which is slated for floor debate starting Monday, the Obama administration noted that an NIB could provide not only grants but also credit-based financing such as loans and bonds:

The Administration encourages the Congress to support the creation of a National Infrastructure Bank and not substitute in its place a national infrastructure grant program ... Once established, a Bank will help forge a new path forward in infrastructure sponsorship and cross-jurisdictional partnership.

The House's 2010 transport spending bill allows half of its $4 billion in high-speed rail money to be transferred to an NIB, provided that such an entity is authorized by Congress next year. That remains an open question, given the strong likelihood of a delay in the next long-term transportation bill.

The $1.1 billion grant program included in the Senate's spending bill follows a model similar to the $1.5 billion "TIGER" grants authorized by this year's economic stimulus law. The TIGER funding is open to proposals in any transport mode -- from rail to ports to cycling -- and will be distributed early next year by the U.S. DOT based on economic and environmental merit, as well as other factors.

While Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has spoken often of the flood of interest generated by the TIGER money, the White House's statement makes clear that it has not abandoned the push for an NIB.

One crucial decision on the NIB, meanwhile, has yet to be made: whether it will be housed within the U.S. DOT, as House transport committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) has suggested, or set up as an independent entity, as Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) proposed in her NIB legislation.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Why Trump Wants To Punish Cities For Free Buses

Hint: it's probably not to make anyone's transportation network better!

February 12, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines Come Together

A large coalition is urging Congress to protect funding for active transportation.

February 12, 2026

Opinion: NYC Is Partly To Blame For Failure of Privately Owned Citi Bike After Winter Storm

The Mamdani administration should fine Lyft for falling short of its contractual obligations — and reward it for meeting or surpassing them.

February 11, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines Are Back to the Future

Some old Greyhound stations are architectural landmarks. Can they be repurposed?

February 11, 2026

Another Conspiracy Theory, This One Around a Vehicle Miles Tax, Comes to California

"None of this required secret meetings or hidden language in the bill. It only required repetition — and the willingness to treat worst-case hypotheticals as settled fact."

February 10, 2026

Safe Streets, Workers Rights, Crash Victims Targeted By Big Tech In Super Bowl Ads

Some Super Bowl commercials are ads. And some are warning shots.

February 10, 2026
See all posts