Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
National Infrastructure Bank

White House Tells Senate: Grants No Substitute For Infrastructure Bank

The White House has reiterated its commitment to a national infrastructure bank (NIB), urging the Senate to reconsider a 2010 transportation spending bill that would "substitute in its place" $1.1 billion in grants.

2003992830.jpgPatty Murray (D-WA) heads the Senate panel in charge of U.S. DOT spending. (Photo: Seattle Times)

In a statement of policy on the Senate's transport spending bill, which is slated for floor debate starting Monday, the Obama administration noted that an NIB could provide not only grants but also credit-based financing such as loans and bonds:

The Administration encourages the Congress to support the creation of a National Infrastructure Bank and not substitute in its place a national infrastructure grant program ... Once established, a Bank will help forge a new path forward in infrastructure sponsorship and cross-jurisdictional partnership.

The House's 2010 transport spending bill allows half of its $4 billion in high-speed rail money to be transferred to an NIB, provided that such an entity is authorized by Congress next year. That remains an open question, given the strong likelihood of a delay in the next long-term transportation bill.

The $1.1 billion grant program included in the Senate's spending bill follows a model similar to the $1.5 billion "TIGER" grants authorized by this year's economic stimulus law. The TIGER funding is open to proposals in any transport mode -- from rail to ports to cycling -- and will be distributed early next year by the U.S. DOT based on economic and environmental merit, as well as other factors.

While Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood has spoken often of the flood of interest generated by the TIGER money, the White House's statement makes clear that it has not abandoned the push for an NIB.

One crucial decision on the NIB, meanwhile, has yet to be made: whether it will be housed within the U.S. DOT, as House transport committee chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) has suggested, or set up as an independent entity, as Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) proposed in her NIB legislation.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: Are We All Living in a ‘Carspiracy’?

How does "car-brain" shape the way we think about the world — even in relatively bike-friendly countries like the U.K.?

July 26, 2024

Friday’s Headlines Share and Share Alike

Bikeshares, and e-bikes and scooters generally, are becoming more popular. That's led to more injuries, highlighting the need for better infrastructure.

July 26, 2024

What the Heck is Going on With the California E-Bike Incentive Program?

The program's launch has been delayed for two years, and currently "there is no specific timeline" for it. Plus the administrator, Pedal Ahead, is getting dragged, but details are vague.

July 26, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Have Cities Run Out of Land?

Chris Redfearn of USC and Anthony Orlando of Cal Poly Pomona on why "pro-business" Texas housing markets are catching up to "pro-regulation" California and what it might mean for future city growth.

July 25, 2024

The Paris Plan for Olympic Traffic? Build More Bike Lanes

A push to make Paris fully bikable for the Olympics is already paying dividends long before the opening ceremonies.

July 25, 2024
See all posts