The Senate’s ‘Clunkers’ Vote: Who Crossed Party Lines? (UPDATED)

The "cash for clunkers" car trade-in rebates are alive and well today after an evening Senate vote to give the taxpayer-subsidized program $2 billion — money that was supposed to go to clean-energy loans and will almost certainly be replaced by new spending.

060713_POL_markWarnerEX.jpgSen. Mark Warner (VA) was one of four Democrats to oppose an extension of "clunkers." (Photo: Slate)

The final vote was 60-37, with a handful of Democrats and Republicans switching sides to vote against their party leaders.

The GOP "clunker" backers were Sens. Bob Corker (TN), Olympia Snowe (ME), George Voinovich (OH), Kit Bond (MO), Susan Collins (ME), Lamar Alexander (TN), and Sam Brownback (KS) — who yanked his support from the rebates’ first iteration in June.

Democrats who opposed the "clunker" money were Sens. Claire McCaskill (MO), Patrick Leahy (VT), Mark Warner (VA), and Ben Nelson (NE).

Warner and Leahy were both openly skeptical of the program’s merits. Warner told a local TV reporter in his state that he questioned the environmental value of the "clunkers" tax credit, adding that they should not become a "long-term … stipend" for car buyers.

Leahy, in a statement explaining his vote, referenced the Obama administration’s reluctance to release complete information about the individual sales being conducted under the "clunkers" banner:

[W]hile we know that cars are moving off sales lots and onto the road, we
have yet to receive enough details about the current sales data to know
the true story of whether this program is working as intended.

Late Update: McCaskill also sounded off on her reasons for opposing more clunkers money. "Remember, around 60,000 to 70,000 people are trading their cars in for new ones every month without this program," she wrote on her Tumblr blog.

  • Dan Schinhofen

    Here we go again. These Republicans need to be thrown out of the Party. This is only good if you work at a car lot otherwise it does nothing, overall, for the country as people will by cars down the road and next year we are going to be told how sales are down from last year.
    One last thing;This is not free money it comes from you and I and if you work in the furniture business maybe you are waiting for the cash for couches or if you have a chicken farm how about cash for cluckers. I like money for maniacs but we already have that, it’s called congressional payroll.
    Throw out the BUMS!!!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Separating Myth from Fact on “Cash for Clunkers”

By Elana Schor |
As debate rages on in the capital over whether to keep assisting the auto industry by giving out more "cash for clunkers" rebates, two assertions are becoming commonplace: the program is helping diminish U.S. oil consumption, and the program is not paid for with new money. (Photo: AP) The first argument was reiterated on Friday […]

House Quickly Sends $2 Billion More to ‘Cash for Clunkers’

By Elana Schor |
The "cash for clunkers" rebate program, which promises new auto buyers up to $4,500 for fuel-efficiency upgrades as small as 2 miles per gallon, is back to life after burning through $1 billion in taxpayer cash. Minutes ago, the House approved $2 billion more in auto rebates by transferring cash that was already headed for […]

Grassley Looking Into Citibank’s Million-Dollar ‘Clunkers’ Deal

By Elana Schor |
Chuck Grassley (IA), the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, today asked the U.S. DOT to answer a question Streetsblog Capitol Hill first wondered about months ago: How did Citibank, the beleaguered recipient of a $45 billion government bailout, snag a contract to administer the Obama administration’s "cash for clunkers" program? Sen. Chuck Grassley […]

How to Judge “Cash for Clunkers”

By Ryan Avent |
(Photo: NYT) At this point, it’s difficult to know exactly what the government’s "cash for clunkers" program is supposed to accomplish. Claims about its economic and environmental benefits are increasingly detached from reality, and the chief advantage of the program would seem to be that it "worked," in the sense that it was popular among […]