Skip to Content
Streetsblog USA home
Streetsblog USA home
Log In
v0001261.jpg...How about this one? (Photo: Wellsy's World)
R000361.jpgIs this senator gettable for the climate bill? (Photo: Washington Post)

Nate Silver's new analysis of the state of play on climate change in the Senate makes a convincing argument that a carbon cap-and-trade system can become law this year.

In fact, it raises the question of whether two senators ranked as unlikely yes votes can be won over by beefing up the climate bill's treatment of transportation emissions beyond what was passed in the House.

Silver's analysis gives Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) a 17 percent chance of voting for climate legislation, thanks to his state's red-tinged voting pattern and reliance on the coal industry. But it's hard to see Rockefeller opposing a climate bill that includes his proposal to reduce national  transportation-based emissions by 40 percent by 2030 -- which would go a long way towards meeting overall targets for greenhouse gas reduction.

And what about Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH), who reminded fellow members of the Environment and Public Works Committee last month that a new transportation bill would go a long way towards reducing emissions?

Voinovich hails from an industrial state, and he supported a filibuster of last year's Senate climate bill. Still, he sounds susceptible to an argument from Democratic leaders that in the absence of a broad federal transportation bill this year, it's important to tackle the issue during the climate change debate.

(ed. note. A typo in an earlier version of this post mis-labeled Voinovich's party. Thanks to the commenter in question.)

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog USA

The Missing Ingredients in America’s ‘Minimobility’ Revolution

Cargo trikes, GEMs, bike rickshaws, and other light electric vehicles could help wean America off cars — but a new grant that could help cities encourage their adoption is being paused by the Trump administration.

February 11, 2025

Who Benefits from Trump ‘Birthrate’ Funding Scheme? Wealthier, Whiter Drivers

This prioritization lacks evidence of how it will meet the memo’s stated purpose to “bolster the American economy and benefit the American people.”

February 11, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Man the Barricades

After the deadly New Year's Eve truck attack in New Orleans, how can cities better protect pedestrians from increasingly heavy and powerful vehicles?

February 11, 2025

Trump Can’t Legally Kill Congestion Pricing, But When Has That Ever Stopped Him?

New York's leaders can't take Donald Trump's threats to congestion pricing, and the constitutional order, lying down — but they might anyway.

February 11, 2025

Op-Ed: Amtrak Isn’t Profitable — And That’s Okay

"As a for-profit company, Amtrak fails ... spectacularly. As a government agency, created half a century ago to carry out a public purpose recognized in law and in Supreme Court rulings, it is a spectacular success worth celebrating, supporting, and building up."

February 10, 2025
See all posts