Skip to content

As Another Major Storm Looms, Will Candidates Keep Ignoring Climate?

How's this for irony: For the first time in more than a decade, this year's presidential candidates failed to have a substantive discussion of climate change -- save for one candidate (guess which one!) mocking the whole concept.

How’s this for irony: For the first time in more than a decade, this year’s presidential candidates failed to have a substantive discussion of climate change — save for one candidate (guess which one!) mocking the whole concept.

Now Hurricane Sandy is looming over the eastern seaboard, so menacing the stock market is closed and the subways aren’t running in New York City. Reports say that parts of Manhattan are already flooding, before the storm has made landfall.

In the final days of this protracted presidential campaign — waged over issues like taxes and health care — the practical imperative to address climate change is impossible to ignore, says James Rowen at the Political Environment:

I’m not saying that human behavior and fossil fuel burn caused this storm, but it’s the height of denial to say that our climate isn’t reflecting the new, post-industrial ‘normal’ long-predicted: heavier rain events, extreme weather outbreaks and growing danger to low-lying, coastal areas that will take lives and greatly add to public budgets and emergency spending.

Anyone want to guess at how long it will take to restore electrical power, finish the cleanup, add up the damage and pay off the claims this time? Because of a monster hurricane. It’s nearly November?

The oceans, air temperatures and precipitation are all intricately interwoven; you can call a decade of record warmth and repeated big storms, floods and harsh fire ‘seasons’ a mere coincidence, but it would have been better, and still would be useful to treat them as real and addressable circumstances.

I don’t give President Obama an “A” on these matters, but I think we can say that if Mitt Romney’s anti- EPA/free market worship philosophy gets free rein in The White House, and if the Koch brothers are over for dinner, you can expect lower grades.

Elsewhere on the Network today: West North says a “flat fare” transit system would unfairly penalize urban residents of greater Washington, DC. I Bike TO points out that Toronto’s Jarvis Street bike lane, slated for removal by Mayor Rob Ford, has seen rapid and continuing growth in cycling. And Pedestrian Observations says that when comparing transit costs across countries, there are a few things you have to consider.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog USA

State Bill Would Stop Highway Expansions Near Vulnerable New Yorkers

April 3, 2026

Friday’s Headlines Keep Our Eyes on the Road, Our Hands Upon the Wheel

April 3, 2026

Friday Video: A Master List of All The Reasons Why Car Domination Sucks

April 2, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Civil Rights, Civic Transport

April 2, 2026

Study: How Capping Vehicle Sizes Could Help Save the World

April 2, 2026
See all posts