Mica, LaHood Stump at AASHTO Meeting

Rep. John Mica promised state DOT leaders this morning that he would deliver a six-year reauthorization bill. He said he had previously thought of advancing a shorter-term bill but transportation officials convinced him of the need for greater certainty. With the full zeal of the converted, he announced, “Anyone who talks about anything less than a six-year bill, I’ll take you outside and beat the crap out of you.”

Photo credit: Joe Burbank/##http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2010/11/sunday-guest-list-rep-john-mica-on-cnns-state-of-the-union-hillary-clinton-visits-three-shows.html##Orlando Sentinel##

Later in the morning, Republican staffers argued for a Highway Trust Fund devoted just to highways (“back to basics,” they call it) but Mica stands firm in calling for “not just a highway bill, but a transportation bill.” He told AASHTO that he wants the bill to cover all modes. When he talks about finding money in underused programs, like the Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing Program, he made it clear that he would keep that money for rail and not shift it to other modes. Somewhat opaquely, he said the rail section of the transportation bill “will be anywhere from one paragraph to 20 pages.”

Mica made it clear he didn’t have a bill in his back pocket and couldn’t answer any questions about its size. He grumbled that he and then-committee chair Jim Oberstar were ready to pass a bill back in 2009 but the administration wanted to wait 18 months, and even that 18-month hold has been a patchwork of six extensions. (It’ll be seven by the time this week is over – the House is voting this afternoon on the seventh extension, to keep the program going at current levels until September 30.)

Meanwhile, Mica called unemployment insurance just another “cockamamie” idea for putting people back to work, saying if we had just put that money toward infrastructure we’d have six percent unemployment by now.

He, and Secretary Ray LaHood, who spoke after him, reiterated for the umpteenth time that while the transportation system has to “spend within its means” (because “that’s the directive of the House of Representatives”), the gas tax is decidedly “off the table,” to the great frustration of many state DOT officials. They wondered how he would achieve his goal of “stabilizing the highway trust fund” without a gas tax hike.

State officials also expressed that Mica’s directive of “doing more with less” rubbed them the wrong way. One official stood up in a later session and said she finds that departments usually end up doing less with less and doesn’t really know how it can be otherwise.

They do, however, find common ground on the need to speed up project delivery, especially when federal money (and federal requirements) are involved. Mica said this was one of the most prominent issues the committee heard about on its listening tour.

“We can deliver projects faster without running over environmental rules or eliminating rights for redress,” Mica said. “We can do things concurrently; we can shorten timeframes.”

For his part, Secretary LaHood spoke mainly in soundbites about the president’s “bold” plan, “the boldest in the history of transportation.” He trumpeted the achievements of the stimulus plan and said criticism that it didn’t work is just “baloney.” He asked audience members for specific proposals for saving money, raising new revenues, and speeding up projects but had nothing of his own to offer about how the administration plans to do any of those things. Indeed, the administration has made it clear that it plans to leave those thorny questions to Congress.

  • Daphna

    I am so disappointed that Mica says a gas tax hike is off the table. I thought politicians were finally realizing the necessity and benefits of raising the gas tax.

  • jd

    Awesome and far-sighted: “Anyone who talks about anything less than a six-year bill, I’ll take you outside and beat the crap out of you.”

    Lame and short-sighted: “the gas tax is decidedly ‘off the table'”.

    Sounds like a mixed bag. Not really the kind of transit vision this country needs ….

  • Glen

    We are just about 20 years at the same gas tax rate…does anything else cost 1993 prices? We need to grow up and face the fact it cost money to do things and stop kidding ourselfs that someone just maby someone else will pay for it. Even 36 cents would bring in 400 billion..

  • Ron

    Ronald Reagan fought for a 5 cent a gallon gas tax, because he knew how vitally important it was to our nation’s infrastructure and future economy.

  • Ben

    Stop calling it a gas tax hike. Start calling it “putting an end to socialised gasoline”.

  • Just Convert Gas Tax to a Percentage

    Folks, we should push for converting the gas tax to a percentage of the retail price. Set the percentage to be revenue-neutral for this year. Watch revenues fly upward with peak oil.

  • Jerry Sullivan

    Folks, just remember this. Most politicians are paid by the highway interests and we rail supporters in Florida know as well as anyone that anything that might remotely help move rail forward in this country is going to be fought to the last gasp by the entrenched highway folks. It is 20 years past the time when we ought to have started weaning ourselves off the fly-drive mentality.
    Remember, once we had a transcontinental train, and a great one it was, until John Mica & Katrina got it shut down. Flying is fine if you are a business man in a hurry, but it is no way to go for liesure travel unless you are in a hurry for that too.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Mica Presses for Policy Ideas at Vancouver Hearing on Next Transpo Bill

|
Cross-posted from BikePortland At the outset of the “listening session” on the next long-term transportation bill in Vancouver yesterday, House Transportation and Infrastructure committee chair John Mica tried to make it clear that he wanted to talk about crafting legislation, not specific projects. Unfortunately not everyone got the message. In his opening remarks, Mica told […]

Mica Transpo Bill Shrinks Spending 33%, Eliminates Bike-Ped Guarantee

|
House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica’s proposed transportation reauthorization bill includes $230 billion over six years, a reduction of 33 percent compared to spending levels in the last multi-year bill. The proposal, which he unveiled at a standing-room-only press event in the committee hearing room today, eliminates any federal guarantee (he calls it a “set-aside”) for […]

Mica’s Measurements: $230 Billion, Six Years

|
Early reports have spilled some of the beans on Rep. John Mica’s proposal for the next transportation reauthorization, which he’s rolling out for reporters in an hour. (Note that he’s still not formally introducing the bill and we’ll have no draft legislative text to pore over. With luck, he’ll at least give a timeline today […]

Mica: “The Focus of the Bill Is on the National Highway System”

|
First, to recap: The transportation reauthorization proposal that House Transportation Committee Chair John Mica unveiled yesterday (sans legislative text) calls for $230 billion over six years, cutting 33 percent out of current spending levels. The plan maintains the current 80/20 split between highways and transit funding, supports state infrastructure banks in lieu of a national […]