Arizona Nixes Speed-Limit Enforcement Cameras

In the latest in a series of high-profile conservative moves, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R) administration has announced it will stop using cameras to enforce speed limits on the state’s highways — ending a program once billed as a boon to road safety that would also help raise revenue.

dps_killer_3.jpgA speed-camera image of the car belonging to Thomas Destories, accused last year of killing a speed camera worker. (Photo: Phx. New Times)

The end of the speed-limit enforcement program, first reported by the Arizona Republic, came after months of stinging criticism from conservative groups that viewed the cameras as an violation of drivers’ rights. Arizona drivers also have mounted their own rebellions against the speed cameras, with one donning a monkey mask to escape liability and others blocking the lenses with Silly String, Post-Its, or other items.

The cameras are programmed to only notice drivers who exceed posted speed limits by more than 10 miles per hour, with some geared to monitor red-light infractions and illegal turns. The fines for violators exceed $150, although the Department of Public Safety canceled any ticket that was not hand-delivered to drivers within 120 days.

Brewer’s Democratic predecessor as governor, now-Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, started the enforcement camera program in 2008. Napolitano touted its road safety benefits in explaining her move, describing the state’s dwindling coffers as a secondary concern.

"[T]he plain fact of the
matter is from a public safety perspective, that the photo radar has
proven to be a technology that actually helps road safety and we would
have proposed this irrespective of the downturn in revenue numbers," she told the AP at the time.

But the notion that the cameras were employed first and foremost as a money-maker for the state proved enduring. As the Republic reported yesterday:

[O]nly about 30 percent of the citations were paid, generating
about $63.5 million in revenue, which went into a fund the Legislature
controlled.

Among those who criticized the financial motives of the system was Gov. Jan Brewer, then-secretary of state.

"She did not support the state photo-radar system because it
appeared from the beginning to be designed exclusively as a revenue
generator," Paul Senseman, a Brewer spokesman, said in an e-mail.

Judith Lee Stone, president of the advocacy group Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, said she was "disappointed" about Arizona’s move, reluctantly predicting that the elimination of cameras would lead to higher crash and injury rates on state roads.

"Unfortunately, some politicians have said, ‘We’re going to make money off of this,’" Stone told Streetsblog Capitol Hill in an interview. "It’s very important that the safety aspects of [speed cameras] become known."

As Brewer’s administration winds down its photo enforcement effort, the Canadian province of British Columbia is gearing up to begin a similar program administered by Redflex, the same company that set up speed-limit cameras in Arizona.

  • MinNY

    Arizona citizens are really concerned about privacy rights? Papers, please.

  • JohnB

    I don’t see any problem with speed camera’s. At least, not any more than with red-light canera’s.

    The usual defense is that “I wasn’t driving”. and if the photo clearly doesn’t show your face, that is a reasonable argument.

    But then, given that it is your vehicle, you should be able to state who was driving. and that isn’t self-incrimination and so not reasonable to refuse to answer.

    Given that speed camera’s are all over Europe, I find it odd that we don’t have them here.

  • Jim Frank

    Another example of how not to do it. You have to tell people what the money is going to spent for and get their buy in. In London the money went for better transit and people came around!

  • EmBer

    One reason I would like to see less car traffic on the road is keep more of a human feel to the city. Having even more surveillance cameras goes against that.

  • Jass

    Arizona has been having one hell of a year.

    And yeah, hearing “Arizona” and “concerned about rights” in the same story is laughable.

    It’s almost as funny (and by funny I mean CRAZY) as the republicans sponsoring a bill that will allow the government to remove someones citizenship before trial….but fighting against a bill that would prevent people on the “do not fly” list from buying a gun, because they must stand up for gun rights.

  • While I’m not opposed to these cameras per se, I am opposed to the way Arizona was using them. Speed cameras make sense in school zones, pedestrian-heavy areas, and residential zones. Unfortunately, Arizona was also using them on their interstates, and that left a bad taste in many Arizonans mouths. One camera was at the very end of a 75 mph zone on I-10 as the speed limit dropped to 65 mph. This specific camera – and ones like it on Arizona’s interstates – were not used for safety, they were used for revenue. Unfortunately, those are the cameras that got the most attention.

  • BB

    They sure don’t complain about traffic cameras. The ones which tell them where not to go.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

There’s No Doubt: Traffic Enforcement Cameras Save Lives

|
Gawker dished out some richly-deserved ridicule to Tennessee State Senator Jon Lundberg yesterday, following reports that he is co-sponsoring legislation to outlaw the specific speeding camera that nabbed him doing 60 in a 45 zone last October. Lundberg denied that the incident had any impact on his decision to sponsor in the legislation, and contested the […]

More Evidence That Speed Cameras Work

|
The evidence is clear: Speed cameras save lives. Here’s the latest success story — an update from Jonathan Maus at Bike Portland on the city’s first speed camera, which was installed on Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway last month: Here are some facts about the BHH camera released by PBOT today: Before the cameras were installed, an average 1,417 vehicles a day […]

The Problem With Speed Cameras That Don’t Catch Most Speeders

|
Residents of urban neighborhoods across the country are increasingly advocating for lower speed limits and automated traffic enforcement. As the above graphic illustrates, the stakes are high for pedestrians. But in some jurisdictions where speed cameras are in use, motorists can drive much faster than the speed limit without penalty. In New York, for instance, […]

Five Key Lessons From Europe’s Vision Zero Success

|
Cross-posted from the Vision Zero Network From the moment that Vision Zero began capturing attention in American cities, we’ve heard many admiring references to its success in Europe, particularly in its birthplace of Sweden. I’m fortunate to have the opportunity to research those experiences and their lessons for the growing number of American communities working […]

Vox Pulls Back the Curtain on “Scam” to Save Lives With Red Light Cameras

|
You can usually count on Vox for accurate, research-based explainers of public policy issues. That’s why the new Vox video on red light cameras is so monumentally disappointing. Researchers have established that red light cameras make streets safer by reducing potentially fatal T-bone collisions, though they do lead to more rear-end crashes, which tend not to be very serious. […]