Advocates: Hey, Mayor Lori, Chicago Needs Congestion Pricing

Activists are urging the city's new mayor, Lori Lightfoot, to adopt surcharges to raise revenue for transit.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot may consider congestion pricing to raise revenue for Chicago's transportation needs.
Mayor Lori Lightfoot may consider congestion pricing to raise revenue for Chicago's transportation needs.

Chicago could be the “second” city in a new way: It may become the second major burg to institute congestion pricing — if transit advocates get their way.

Just six weeks after Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot was inaugurated, Illinois transportation and public policy experts sent a letter last week urging the new administration to impose surcharges on Chicago roadways to reduce congestion, curb car emissions, and raise revenue for the city.

“Transportation is now the number one cause of emissions in our nation, as well as in Illinois where more than half of carbon emissions from transportation come from the Chicago area,” stated the letter, composed by the Active Transportation Alliance, the Metropolitan Planning Council, the Center for Neighborhood Technology, the Shared Mobility Center, and other institutions.

The groups encouraged Mayor Lightfoot to adopt a program that accounts for all types of vehicles including trucks, buses and ride share vehicles, while setting different rates depending on when and where they’re on the road.

For instance, motorists making trips by themselves in parts of Chicago where there’s ample transit would pay a higher rush hour fee than drivers who carpool with others in places where there aren’t as many transit options. And those in low-income neighborhoods could be exempted or have a significantly lower fee.

Lightfoot’s transition team has been open to new ways of raising revenue for transportation such as congestion pricing and a new surcharge for taxis entering the Loop, which is what Windy City locals call the area encircled by multiple elevated subway lines in Chicago’s downtown business district. Her office said it would reach out to neighborhood groups, community leaders, and transit experts for an equitable solution.

“Mayor Lightfoot is committed to building a comprehensive and reliable transportation system that alleviates congestion, equitably serves Chicago’s residents and moves our city forward,” according to a statement sent to the Chicago Tribune.

The letter also urged the mayor to change the ride-share tax in order to encourage passengers to take more pooled trips and to set aside any revenue raised from those fees to enhancing public transit and bike infrastructure. Chicago has a 72-cent-per-ride fee for ride shares which goes to the Chicago Transit Authority.

But the letter did not offer a range of fees for drivers or spell out how and where a congestion pricing system would eventually be installed. Transit experts suggested the Lightfoot administration further examine the idea.

Any congestion plan in Chicago would be enormously complicated.

Advocates in New York spent more than a decade wrangling state lawmakers and three gubernatorial administrations to approve a plan to toll vehicles entering Manhattan below Central Park — but it finally passed in this session and will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2021.

Chicago will need to decide whether the primary goal of the plan is to raise revenue or to reduce traffic — and then where to install the toll barriers it so that congestion pricing achieves its maximum intended effect, experts say. Almost half of Chicago’s ride-share rides took place in the city’s wealthy neighborhoods including the Loop, Lakeview, West Town and parts of the North Side, according to a Tribune analysis.

“It would probably be easier if you confined it to the Loop because there’s still limited types of entry and exits,” Northern Illinois University professor Michael Peddle told WBEZ. “Whether you want to exempt people who live in the Loop, or people who live in the city of Chicago, that’s another issue. Do you want to tax or put a congestion fee on delivery trucks? What do you want to do about public transit fares?”

 

7 thoughts on Advocates: Hey, Mayor Lori, Chicago Needs Congestion Pricing

  1. “put a congestion fee on delivery trucks”

    How about they start by just aggressively ticketing them when they are blocking traffic lanes between say, 7am and 7pm? It’s currently ridiculous on a number of streets in the Loop.

  2. The new Toyota hybrid AWD RAV4 costs only $800 more than the standard version and gets 39 miles per gallon. If is is reliable as the Prius has been then vehicles like this can be driven for hundreds of thousands of miles at a very low cost and CO2 emission. Thus Uber like service with vehicles like this with multiple passengers may be far more fuel efficient than current buses and trains. It’s not congestion pricing, it’s cordon pricing, Regardless of any congestion of substantial traffic. They’re cordon charges, that is, a fee for crossing a particular line in the city or urban area. In other words a geography fee. cordon charges don’t really relieve congestion; instead, their real goal is to raise money that cities can then waste on useless urban monuments.

  3. More taxes by the anti- car crowd are good for the pet projects. Hey i have an idea why don’t transit users pay their own way, like drivers always do. Then they can have all the useless projects they want, as long as they are paying for them.

  4. If you wanna tax having a car better make it more efficient to use publoc transit and not just for the fancy line either. Red brown and green. Extend in to the burbs and install bus only lanes.

  5. “LazyReader” is an apt name, huh. Read the letter–it calls for dynamic congestion pricing, not cordon pricing. The revenue would go to funding more space-efficient transportation options: transit, cycling, and walking.

    The letter also calls for altering the ride-hailing tax so that shared rides aren’t taxed higher than single-occupancy rides.

  6. Congestion pricing advocates have no right to tell motorists where they can and cannot go. Congestion pricing is an unconstitutional tax. This is why they are replacing toll booths on toll roads with toll transponders or license plate readers to send the toll to your mailbox, so they can tax you via congestion pricing for every 1000 feet you drive on urban streets. If I were to go to Chicago or New York City and choose to drive on downtown streets: instead of paying the congestion pricing bill I will take it to Federal Court since its unconstitutional. If you want to solve traffic congestion in Chicago or New York City how about removing the interstates in the urban areas of the city and restore the original street network.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Congestion Pricing: Does New York Have the Will?

|
Brad Aaron reports: Political will, holistic planning, centralized management. That’s what Malcolm Murray-Clark says it takes to implement an effective congestion pricing plan. He should know. The Director of Congestion Charging at Transport for London (TfL) oversees a program that is as ambitious as it is successful — a program that went from idea to […]

Bloomberg Declares Support for a National Carbon Tax

|
New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg will declare his support today for a national carbon tax, according to a report posted this morning on the New York Times City Room blog by metro reporter Sewell Chan: Mayor Bloomberg plans to announce today his support for a national carbon tax. In what his aides are calling […]

Details of the Mayor’s Residential Parking Permit Proposal

|
Potential residential parking permit stickers, curbside regulations, and David Yassky. Here are some more details about the residential parking permit program proposed today by Mayor Bloomberg and DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan: A residential parking permit (RPP) plan will be included in the congestion pricing legislation that will be introduced in the City Council and State […]

Pricing Advocates Call for Impact Study and New Parking Policies

|
Congestion pricing advocate Carolyn Konheim and consulting partner Brian Ketcham are advising the Bloomberg administration to drop its resistance to a congestion pricing Environmental Impact Study. The two say a study is needed to head off "likely 11th hour litigation" aimed at stopping the three-year pilot program from taking effect, a possibility Streetsblog alluded to […]