U.S. Finally Legalizes Modern, European-Style Train Cars

Photo:  Cramos/Wikimedia
Photo: Cramos/Wikimedia

Rail fans, rejoice. Federal rules no longer bar U.S. passenger rail systems from using modern, lightweight train cars.

This week, the Federal Railroad Administration finalized new safety rules [PDF] that bring American standards more in line with those used in Europe — changes that will save American commuter rail operators money and passengers time. Under the new rules, old, heavy trains can now be replaced with lighter, sleeker, more-modern models.

Meeting the Federal Railroad Administration’s onerous and antiquated safety rules has been a big problem for passenger rail operators that use the Federal Railway System (commuter rail and inter-city rail, like Amtrak). The U.S. doesn’t have a very large domestic train car market, so importing train cars from Europe and Asia is often the cheapest and lowest-risk option.

But FRA rules had required significant design changes. Most important, American train cars had to be built to withstand 800,000 pounds of frontal impact. Former Amtrak CEO David Gunn complained U.S. trains had to be designed like “high-velocity bank vaults.” Rather than just bulk up, European and Asian trains instead are designed to absorb impacts and avoid collisions in the first place. And they have better safety records.

In the past, transit agencies and Amtrak had to order trains from European or Asian suppliers and then modify the cars to meet American standards — which often caused big problems. Philadelphia’s SEPTA system, for example, had to return 120 brand new rail cars thanks to an engineering defect in 2016.

The new rules will help minimize those problems.

“The modifications that will be necessary to adapt European designs will be very minimal,” said Sandy Johnston, a Boston-based transportation planner and writer of the blog Interant Urbanist. “Every time something has to be modified it introduces additional expense and complication.”

American trains will now be more energy efficient and cheaper thanks to the changes, added Johnson. They will also be more likely to have features that prevent overcrowding, like open gangways.

A small wonky group of urbanist writers and policy experts like Stephen Smith and Marc Scribner have called for the reforms since the early part of the decade. The regulation has been slowly making its way through the federal regulatory process since 2013, and received a final push during the waning days of the Obama Administration. Now it is official.

  • neroden

    It’s actually making much better crashworthiness standards. You don’t know jack shit about what you’re talking about.

    They’ve done actual crash tests — the European-spec trains protect passengers BETTER in a crash than the US 1940s “rolling bank vault” designs.

  • neroden

    Amtrak has legal right-of-way. But talk to the dispatchers at the CN or UP or CSX office, and you’ll discover that they are “encouraged” to dispatch freight trains ahead of passenger trains, even though this is totally illegal.

    To BNSF’s credit, their dispatchers follow the law. (So do CP’s, for whatever reason.)

  • neroden

    OK, maybe if you’re under the age of 8, you can be excused for not realizing that you shouldn’t be playing on the train tracks. But in that case, it’s your parents’ fault.

    Most people hit by trains are actually committing suicide. Nearly all of the remainder are complete dumbasses who think they can “beat the train” and deserve to be hit by trains.

    Very, very occasionally someone gets stuck on tracks due to an equipment malfunction or something — I think it’s happened twice in the last 10 years in the entire US.

  • neroden

    The European-spec “crumple zone” train designs are flat out safer than the 1940s US “rolling bank vault” designs, so there will be *fewer* injuries, and they’ll be *less* severe.

  • neroden

    It is unfortunate that YOU were ill-informed. The Streetsblog piece is 100% correct; Max Wyss and several of the other commenters including myself have provided additional details.

    The European specs, with “crumple zones”, are flat-out safer in every way under every circumstance. They’ve actually done crash tests to prove it.

    The PTC safety system improvements will also help, but even with no signalling at all, the new design rules are just flat out safer.

    “Rolling bank vaults”, like the old 1940s US rules called for, are unsafe.

  • J. Geoff Rove

    Chicago Metra will likely buy the old cars, they just grabbed some old VRE coaches that were originally on the CNW lines. This stuff must have been built 70 years ago.

  • zamzow

    Every thing you just posted is a lie ,you duplicitous dork !

  • Hammond Ecks

    I’m betting he’s never set foot outside of the US and all he knows about life in the EU or Japan is from the screeds* on AM talk radio.

    * “They’re all poor!” ‘They’re all socialists!” “They all want to come to the US for health care!” /sigh

  • neroden

    Metra only buys bilevels / gallery cars. At this point I think they’ve bought all the old bilevels & gallery cars there are left in North America.

  • Hammond Ecks

    Addendum: He later posted that he’s visited some miserable parts of Africa and Asia. I.e. “All I’ve ever seen is a few dysfunctional third-world countries. That means the entire planet except for ‘Murrica is covered with dysfunctional third-world countries.”

    You just can’t make this stuff up.

  • JZ71

    I don’t doubt that, but given our court system ambulance-chasing attorneys and juries of our “peers”, all it’s going to take is one fatal crash and a large settlement to scare most railroads away from accepting the lighter cars on their tracks.

  • JZ71

    Some juries aren’t bright enough to figure that out, and some lawyers are going to successfully make the “what if” argument.

  • Nice to hear when common sense prevails. Doesn’t happen enough in this country.

  • satrain18

    You mean nearly 40%?

  • satrain18

    Sorry about that separate rail network mistake, but since the rail companies in Europe are owned by one major company per country, I.E,.national railways(SNCF in France, Belgum; Renfe Operadora in Spain; Deutsche Bahn in Germany; Ferrovie dello Stato in Italy; etc.), while here in the US we have at least a hundred rail companies. Also, 90% of all Freight in Europe is transported by roadways. And finally their track so much straighter than those in the US.

  • James White

    This may save some money but lowest risk? Outside of Germany and Poland, nearly bupkis for freight is carried on it’s rails. Passenger rail cars have a small chance of encountering freight.

    In the US, freight is everywhere. Freight is just as common even on the Northeast Corridor. My concern would be that these rule changes threw out the baby along with the bath water.


When Will the Feds Stop Outlawing Railcars Used By the Rest of the World?

The removal of 115 railcars from service in Philadelphia last week was the latest example of the troubles American commuter rail agencies face when purchasing rolling stock. Thanks to cracks in a critical component of the railcars, riders are looking at severe service reductions for at least the entire summer. While U.S. DOT floated a regulatory change that could prevent similar […]

Philly’s Railcar Meltdown and America’s Disastrous Train Regulations

Philadelphia’s commuter rail system has been plunged into turmoil after transit officials discovered a defect in SEPTA railcars this weekend. All 120 railcars delivered just three years ago by Hyundai Rotem, an American subsidiary of the Hyundai Motor Group, have cracks in load-bearing components. SEPTA officials say caution requires them to remove the cars from service for repairs. That […]

Deadly Year for European Rail Still Safer Than the American Average

Does the recent train derailment in Spain, which killed 79 people, justify America’s onerous approach to regulating rail safety? Federal Railroad Administration safety rules are designed to maximize “crashworthiness,” making U.S. passenger trains heavier and more expensive than their counterparts in Europe, where the safety approach is based on crash avoidance. So what do we have to […]

What American Commuter Rail Can Learn From Paris

In the U.S., regional rail is mostly good for one type of trip: the commute. But in Paris, regional rail is oriented toward all types of trips, and people ride throughout the day, not just at rush hour. One key to success is running frequent, predictable service all day long.