Albuquerque Hits a New Low With Cruel Response to Pedestrian Deaths

The Albuquerque City Council isn't interested in fixing intersections like this, where a driver killed a pedestrian last week. Photo: Google Maps
The Albuquerque City Council isn't interested in fixing intersections like this, where a driver killed a pedestrian last week. Photo: Google Maps

The lengths that lawmakers will go to avoid doing anything substantive for pedestrian safety would be comical, if the consequences weren’t so serious.

In New Mexico, drivers have killed 51 people walking so far this year. But rather than using its resources to rein in speeding, failure to yield, distracted driving, or other driver behaviors that maim and kill, Albuquerque City Council is using its resources to — get ready for this — harass people who panhandle on the side of the road.

City Council Member Trudy Jones sponsored legislation making it illegal to both beg for money from motorists and for motorists to interact with pedestrians. The bill is called the “Pedestrian Safety Ordinance,” and Jones claims it would “make our streets safer and curbs safer,” but it’s a transparent attempt to use traffic safety as a fig leaf to cover constitutional issues with panhandling bans. The council passed it unanimously.

In an embarrassing editorial this weekend, the Albuquerque Journal defended the legislation as a boon to public safety even though there’s absolutely zero evidence that it addresses the causes of pedestrian injuries and deaths.

Meanwhile, last week, a driver struck and killed a pedestrian at the intersection shown above. If the City Council truly cared about protecting pedestrians, it would allocate resources to fix this kind of high-speed street design. By laying blame at the feet of the city’s most vulnerable people, council members are shirking their own responsibility to make streets safer,

Good grief. (Thanks to reader Khalil Spencer for bringing this to our attention.)

More recommended reading today: Writing at Medium, Darin Givens explains how the Braves’ new suburban stadium is totally out of reach for anyone who relies on transit. And BikePortland reports that the Senate GOP’s tax bill does away with a modest benefit for bike commuters while retaining the much larger and more destructive parking benefit.

  • Alicia

    Source: the fact that drivers control the speed of the car by how hard they step on the gas pedal. And the fact that drivers have a choice of watching where they are going (including looking for pedestrians) or not.

  • Gerry

    Better that they should be driving?

  • Trudy Gutierrez (Storm Lily)

    I am very sure the young man that was killed that is posted here was my son Isaiah Gutierrez who was not homeless, he suffered from schizophrenia, this is the crap i was saying first this happened 5 months ago me and my family have been looking for him since the 6th Nov. we were just informed on the 8th of April. You that are quick to make such hurtful things about my son whom you didn’t know. not only was a human being he was a son. a brother a grandson a uncle he just wanted to be normal. he just turned 23, Also lost his little brother in march of 2016 and his father in 2oo6 . so while you want to judge my son put yourself in his shoes, and i will pray all you people who think they can talk about someone you know nothing about.don’t ISAIAH DANIEL GUTIERREZ NOT SOME HOMELESS DRUGGED UP PAN HANDLING.

  • Trudy Gutierrez (Storm Lily)

    how cares what city or state this happened In, that was my son a


Phoenix Trying to Get a Handle on Pedestrian Deaths

Being a pedestrian in Phoenix is dangerous business. This is a place that comes by its reputation as a car-friendly city honestly. Phoenix pedestrians account for just 2 percent of collisions, but 42 percent of fatalities. That’s the fourth-highest share of overall traffic deaths in the country, behind three cities with much more walking — […]