The 4 Biggest Sins Committed By Reporters Covering Pedestrian Deaths

Each year, motorists on American streets kill nearly 5,000 pedestrians. The loss of life is enormous — equivalent to 12 jumbo jets crashing with no survivors — but the steady drumbeat of pedestrian fatalities doesn’t register as an urgent public safety crisis. Maybe it would seem more urgent if the press covered pedestrian deaths as the preventable outcome of a broken system, instead of a series of random “accidents.”

Reports that accuse pedestrians of "darting" into traffic are remarkably common. Image:
Reports that accuse pedestrians of “darting” into traffic are remarkably common. Image: WKRN Nashville

Most local media reports of pedestrian deaths are just a few sentences long. In that brief space, they still manage to trivialize the issue of pedestrian safety and gloss over the underlying causes of traffic fatalities.

Here are four common problems with how pedestrian deaths are covered in American media and why reporters need to change their approach to traffic violence.

Blaming the victim

The default stance of most coverage is to blame victims for their own deaths. Maybe the reporter will note that the victim was not in a crosswalk, or jaywalking, or reportedly “darted” into traffic.

The underlying message is the same: If only the victim had followed the rules, he or she would still be alive. What never seems to get much scrutiny is how the driver’s actions could have prevented the fatal collision — by traveling at a safe speed, for instance, or just driving attentively on a busy city street.

In reporters’ defense, crash information tends to come directly from flawed police reports that reflect a survivor’s bias.

These reports are often based on a single eyewitness — the driver who hit the victim. Depending on a witness who is potentially culpable for killing someone cannot produce a trustworthy account. Nevertheless, the driver’s version of events is often repeated by police, becoming the basis for local news stories.

Failure to consider street conditions

Wide, high-speed arterial roads like this are extremely dangerous to pedestrians. But road conditions are almost never mentioned in local reporting. Photo: Sean Emerson via Strong Towns
Wide, high-speed arterial streets like this are extremely dangerous to cross on foot. But street conditions are seldom mentioned in local coverage of pedestrian deaths. Photo: Sean Emerson via Strong Towns

Most local news reports entirely ignore the design of the street where the collision happened. But the epidemic of pedestrian deaths can’t be separated from street conditions.

More than half of all pedestrian deaths occur on multi-lane arterial roads. Wide streets flanked by destinations that people walk to — like apartment buildings and commercial development — are particularly deadly, according to a report by Transportation for America.

In fact, as cities dig into the data, stark patterns often emerge. Pedestrian fatalities are often concentrated on just a few streets. In San Jose, for example, 50 percent of traffic fatalities occur on just 3 percent of streets. And nationwide, dangerous corridors tend to be concentrated in low-income areas.

By treating pedestrian deaths as isolated occurrences, reporters fail to convey critical information about where people are at risk and how fatalities can be prevented in the future.

Talking about cars, not drivers

When reporters describe traffic crashes, they often center the car or vehicle rather than the driver.

That makes it easy to lose sight of the fact that most traffic collisions are caused by human error. About 10,000 traffic fatalities a year are speeding-related. Failure-to-yield is a major cause of pedestrian injuries and deaths, and driver distraction is a growing factor.

When the language reporters fall back on makes it sound like vehicles are just going haywire on their own, the underlying role of human behavior gets lost.

Calling pedestrian fatalities “accidents,” not crashes

Sure, most car crashes are not intentional. But that doesn’t mean they’re acts of God that can’t be prevented. When reporters describe crashes as “accidents,” however, it leaves the impression that no one was at fault and nothing can be done to reduce the risk of similar incidents.

Given what we know about how behaviors like speeding, texting, and drunk driving contribute to pedestrian fatalities, reporters should stick to more neutral terms like “collision” or “crash.”

160 thoughts on The 4 Biggest Sins Committed By Reporters Covering Pedestrian Deaths

  1. Ah, now you appear to get that the question of blame and the question of intent are different.

    I can be at fault for doing something that I did not intend.

    Since very few crashes are caused deliberately “accident” is the correct word to use unless we subsequently find a reason to think the death was deliberate e.g. a road rage situation.

  2. Wrong, I can drive badly but still not intend a crash.

    You are failing to differentiate between the case where I intend to kill someone and the case where that death happens because of my negligence.

    The law recognizes that distinction – it’s murder versus manslaughter

  3. No, the huge difference is that if I drive badly and kill you as a result, it’s manslaughter because I did not directly intend your deat,

    If I set out to kill you using my car as a weapon, then it’s murder.

    The first is still an accident even though I am at fault

  4. It’s a crash either way. We add value by noting that it was also deliberate versus accident AND by noting whether there is blame attached or not.

    Since 99.9% of crashes are not intended, “accident” is a reasonable default terms until and unless we know otherwise.

    Many of those 99.9% of accidents will have blame or fault determined.

  5. The first sentence of this article leaves no doubt that Streetsblog’s editorial and reporting staff are mercifully free of objectivity. Motorists ‘kill’ 5000 pedestrians annually, eh? I don’t doubt that motorists are to blame in some of the collisions with pedestrians, but so are pedestrians to blame for some of the collisions. One statement–failure to give/yield right of way–is spot-on. Don’t forget intoxicated drivers, cyclists and pedestrians.

    During my career as a street railway motorman, I saw countless incidences of egregious bicyclist, motorist, and pedestrian misconduct, some of which resulted in collisions with my train. I can’t say that I’m sorry to say that some pedestrians and cyclists kill themselves, as do some motorists–particularly where trains are concerned.

    While US traffic engineering leaves much to be desired, particularly where traffic signal placement & design, the obsession with stop signs, and a reluctance to employ yield signs & roundabouts is concerned, our streets and highways are generally well-designed and laid out, and trying to blame any deficiencies in them for all pedestrian fatalities is wrong in so many ways that I wouldn’t know where to begin, except that our society now has a higher concentration of people who see themselves as exempt from rules.

    The more I navigate through Streetsblog, I find it more of an extremist anti-automobile website than a objectively credible advocate of traffic and pedestrian safety.

  6. Indeed, it takes sheer laziness and inattention on the part of bicyclists or pedestrians to kill themselves. However, I concur with the last sentence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Blaming Pedestrians While Absolving the Streets That Kill Them

It didn’t take long for Louisville to notch its first pedestrian death of the year. Brian O’Neal, 46, was killed on the sixth day of 2016 while trying to cross Dixie Highway. The fact that Dixie Highway was the site of this fatality shouldn’t have surprised anyone who’s paying attention to pedestrian safety in Louisville. The city’s first pedestrian injury also happened on Dixie […]

New Report Maps the Gap Between Pedestrian Risks and Federal Safety Aid

The top 10 most dangerous cities for pedestrians. (Chart: Dangerous by Design report) If the equivalent of one jumbo jet full of Americans died every month, the resulting public outcry would be deafening. Or would it? Anne Canby, the former Delaware transportation secretary who heads the Surface Transportation Policy Partnership (STPP), raised that question today […]