Will Second-Ring Suburbs Choose Evolution or Decline?

Second-ring suburbs are at a crossroads, says Nathaniel Hood at Streets.mn. These aren’t streetcar suburbs, but those that came after, where every home had a garage, the product of an era when driving was considered a symbol of American prosperity.

Residents of Minnetonka recently rejected this concept for an area of town that is dominated by parking lots. Image: Streets.mn
Residents of Minnetonka recently rejected this concept for an area of town that is dominated by parking lots. Image: Streets.mn

With infrastructure maintenance costs rising with age, and no room for more sprawl, these areas must either “build up” or face the possibility of decline, Hood says. But change is difficult. The Minneapolis second-ring suburb of Minnetonka recently had an opportunity to evolve, when presented with a plan for a mixed-use retail center. Instead the town conceded to NIMBY arguments against it, including concerns about parking and traffic.

Hood says the struggle between stability and change will define these places in the coming years:

Aging suburbia is going through an identity crisis. It’s bipolar. Existing residents would like the place to stay much the same. New residents, including those who don’t live there yet, are demanding something else. The problem is that these places can’t continue to stay the same. Yet, the change is too difficult for many to swallow. This is why the default for most suburbs is decline. Growth isn’t built into their DNA.

For those living deep in the suburban pattern, new development doesn’t make your life better. Nearly the entire housing stock of second-ring suburbs is designed in a way that the lack of development is the best option. If a home’s ideal is to be disconnected, then anything near it – whether good or bad – that isn’t nature is taking away from that aesthetic.

Here in lies one of the biggest faults of suburbia: it’s not designed to change. In mature cities, as land values increased, the intensity of development would follow. That’s why downtown Minneapolis, which once had single family homes, now has blocks of towering skyscrapers. This change needs to occur.

The harsh reality is that these places will have to change or face an impending decline. Many first-ring suburbs, such as St. Louis Park, have decided to grow upwards. Will the second-ring follow suit?

Elsewhere on the Network today: Family Friendly Cities ponders why households with children are generally more dependent on cars. And Bike Portland reports the Oregon Department of Transportation has released a new app that will help it gather data on cycling in the state.


The Suburbs Aren’t Dying — They’re Growing Differently

Cross-posted from the Frontier Group. Sommer Mathis said much of what needed to be said about the recent round of “the suburbs are back, baby!” stories on housing trends, including this analysis from Jed Kolko, housing economist at Trulia.com, and the related commentary from Matt Yglesias at Vox. Mathis argues that the concept of a battle for supremacy between cities and […]

Here’s Why No One Shoots Engagement Photos in the Suburbs

Nothing says unbridled passion like a treeless cul-de-sac, right? That’s what Nathaniel Hood, who writes for Streets.mn and Strong Towns, and his new bride-to-be were thinking when they shot these engagement photos as a gag. Hood said on his website: Engagement photos are either urban or rural. They are either a former factory or a […]

Stranded on Two Feet: The Danger of Gaps in the Pedestrian Network

Anyone who does a fair amount of walking to get around will encounter gaps in the pedestrian network sooner or later. Sometimes they might just be minor annoyances, but they can also put people in very dangerous positions. Clark Parker at Streets.mn stumbled into a pedestrian gap when he tried to send a letter on a Saturday afternoon. The only post office open […]